期刊文献+

“大球理论”与教育中父母及子女的权利 被引量:2

"Great-ball Theory" and Rights for Parents and Children in Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 “大球理论”是在“自由教育”理论的基础上提出的。“大球理论”认为,父母对子女教育的希望和理想并不意味着要为子女规定固定的成长模式。父母拥有选择子女接受何种教育的权利;但同时,子女也有接受教育的自主权。关于家长在子女教育上的权利,应该既反对压制子女,同时也要公正地对待父母对孩子的殷切希望和他们为抚养子女做出的牺牲;关于子女受教育的自主权,应重视从小培养他们的自主意识,使之懂得追求心灵的自由。 The 'great-ball theory' was put forward on the basis of 'liberal education theory'. According to the 'great-ball theory', parents have the right to choose education for their children, who in turn also enjoy the autonomy for receiving education. Parents' hope and ideal for their children's education do not imply that they should choose fixed modes for the growth of their children. In this regard, we oppose parents' smothering the autonomy of their children, but we should also understand parents' ardent expectations for their children and the sacrifice they have made in fostering their children. As to children's autonomy for education, due importance should be attached to the cultivation of children's sense of self-reliance for helping them become aware of the necessity for seeking the freedom of soul.
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期63-68,93,共7页 Educational Research
关键词 “大球理论” 自由教育 选择权 自主权 自主性 家庭教育 伦理道德 great-ball theory, selection right, autonomy, self-reliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ackerman, B.A. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven. 1980. 159.
  • 2Gosse, Edmund. Father and Son. Harmondsworth(UK). 1979. 141-144.
  • 3Galston, William. Civic Education in the Liberal State.Rosenblum. 1989.89-101.
  • 4Lomasky, L. Persons,Rights,and the Moral Community.New York. 1987. 165-87.
  • 5Crittenden, B. Parents, the State and the Right to Educate. Melbourne. 1988. 103-37.
  • 6Pauktuutit. The lnuit way: A Guide to lnuit Culture.Ottawa. 1990.11.
  • 7Feinberg, J. Harm to self. New York. 1986. 47-51.
  • 8Rawls. J. Political Liberalism. New York. 1993. 332.
  • 9HilI,T. Servility and Self-Respect. Dillon. 1995. 76-92.

同被引文献30

  • 1于丹丹,赵海楠.家校合作中主体与权责的边界问题思考[J].教学与管理,2020,0(6):50-52. 被引量:19
  • 2彭虹斌.择校权实现的差序格局[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(8):58-62. 被引量:7
  • 3THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT. Education Act 1944 Section 76 [EB/OL].(2005-01-01) [2009-06-01 ]. http://www.opsi. gov.uk/acts/acts 1944.
  • 4LUTZ R REUTER. School and civic values in Germany[M]// PATRICK WOLF, STEPHEN MACEDO, DAVID J. Educating citizens. Washington D C: Brookings Institution Press, 2004: 222.
  • 5朱开轩.义务教育阶段不允许高收费:对所谓“贵族学校”或豪华型学校,国家教委再次明确表示不赞成[N].人民日报,1995-01-19(3).
  • 6高洪源.择校与基础教育发展机制重塑[M]//褚宏启.中国教育管理评论.北京:教育科学出版社,2003:334.
  • 7COUNCIL ON TRIBUNALS. Annual Report: 1991-92[R]. London: HMSO,1992:65;.
  • 8COUNCIL ON TRIBUNALS. Annual Report: 1995-96[R]. London: HMSO,1996:104.
  • 9DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND SKILLS. Admissions appeals for maintained primary and secondary schools in Eengland: 2001/2002[R]. London, 2003.
  • 10RUTH JONATHAN. Choice and control in education: parental rights, individual liberties and social justice[J]. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1989, 37(4): 326-337.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部