摘要
1951年,围绕中国农业发展道路问题,毛泽东与刘少奇发生了争论。文章试从工业化的角度剖析争论双方的是与非,认为毛泽东的观点有其客观合理性,适应了建国初期工业化起步的要求,因而在特定时期被历史选择;而刘少奇的观点现在看来虽有其合理性,但却未得到实施,并不完全是因为毛泽东的个人权威所致,其中也有这种主张与当时工业化的要求不相适应的原因。
In 1951, Mao Tse-tung and Liu Shao-qi have an argument for the developing road of Chinese agriculture. In this article the authors try to analyse the right and wrong of the contending sides from the viewpoint of industrilization and think that Mao's standpoint is impersonal, rational and adaptable to the requirement of starting to practice industrialization, so it was adopted by history in the special period; However, Liu Shao-qi's viewpoint was refused partly owing to Mao Tse-tung' sauthority, but the principal reason is unadaptivity of his opinions to the requirement of indus-tralization at that time, although it is rational too in the eyes of today's people.
出处
《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2004年第1期55-59,共5页
Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
基金
中国农业大学两课教学与研究课题基金资助项目:从中共三代领导人三农观透视中国农业现代化道路
关键词
工业化
合作社经济
个体经济
industralization
cooperation economy
individual economy