摘要
对抵押效力范围的三个问题 (抵押物的附合物、从物和天然孳息 )从民法上对物的理论出发 ,应当分别考察附合物、从物的独立性以及独立程度的大小来确实实行抵押的效力范围。对抵押权实行前分离的附合物和抵押权设定后新增的从物为抵押权效力所不及。对天然孳息上存在第三人权利时 ,应当从第三人的权利性质能否对抗抵押权来判断抵押的实行的效力问题。
A simple analysis is made of the scope of enforcement of a mortgage claim, including three aspects (adhered object, accessory and natural interests of mortgage). Based on principles of civil law on object, three aspects should be observed according to their independence and the dgree of independence, and then judge their scope of enforcement of mortgage claims respectively. It is pointed out that if a adhered object is scattered before a mortgage claim, or if the advent of a new accessory is after a promised mortgage, the enforcement of mortgage claim has no force on them. If there is an existed third party’s right related to the natural interests, the enforcement of a mortgage claim depended on whether the third party's right can reject the mortgage claim.
出处
《郧阳师范高等专科学校学报》
2003年第6期93-95,共3页
Journal of Yunyang Teachers College
关键词
抵押权
实行效力
范围
mortgage claims
enforcement of mortgage claim
scope