期刊文献+

评价中国制造业国际竞争力的实证方法研究——兼与波特指标及产业分类法比较 被引量:102

Research on Empirical Method of Valuing International Competitiveness of Chinese Manufacturing--Comparing with Porter's Index and Industry Taxonomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文应用内容分析法,对近年来发表在国内权威和核心期刊上有关中国制造业国际竞争力评价的重要实证文献进行了回顾与综述,分析了这些实证研究中存在的问题和可取之处,并就两个关键点进行了探讨一是在进行产业国际竞争力的评价时,应该如何选取方法和指标;二是在对中国制造业的国际竞争力进行实证研究时,应当采用何种产业分类法。经过对产业竞争力四个层次的划分及与波特方法的比较,得出对中国制造业的国际竞争力进行评价的方法结论以产业利润率、全球市场份额和劳动生产率/平均工资率三者为评价指标;用相当于ISIC二分位的国内28个制造业部门进行产业分类。 By using content analysis, we give a retrospection and review to important empirical literatures published in domestic authority and core journals about international competitiveness valuing of Chinese manufacturing. We analyses the problems and achievements of these empirical research, and discuss two points of focus: how to select methods and indexes when valuing industrial international competitiveness, and which taxonomy should be adopted while studying Chinese manufacturing's international competitiveness. After classifying of four competitiveness levels and comparing with Porter's way, we get the correct method conclusion: select industrial profit radio, global market share and labor productivity/average wage as indexes, take 28 domestic manufacturing department which corresponding to ISIC two digit as classifying taxonomy.
机构地区 武汉大学商学院
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期30-37,共8页 China Industrial Economics
关键词 中国制造业 国际竞争力 实证方法 Chinese manufacturing international competitiveness empirical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1B Balassa. Trade Liberation and Revealed Competitive Advantage[J]. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 1965.
  • 2EarlBabbie.社会研究方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,2000..
  • 3MichaelPorter.国家竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002..
  • 4MichaelPorter.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997..
  • 5PaulKrugman MauficeObsffeld.国际经济学(第五版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 6陈立敏,谭立文.产业国际竞争力的评价方法研究——兼论波特体系的内在矛盾[J].经济管理,2003,29(24):4-11. 被引量:24
  • 7B. Balassa. Trade Liberation and Revealed Competitive Advantage[J]. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 1965.

二级参考文献24

  • 1任若恩.关于中国制造业国际竞争力的初步研究[J].中国软科学,1996(9):74-82. 被引量:42
  • 2迈克尔·波特 陈小悦(译).《竞争优势》[M].华夏出版社,1997..
  • 3《国家竞争优势》,华及出版社2002年版,第228页.
  • 4Michael E. Porter, Hirotaka Takeuchi, and M.Sakakibara,2000, Can Japan Compete? Basingstoke, England: .Macmillan.
  • 5Michael E.Porter and Debra van Opstal, U.S.Competitiveness 2001: Strengths, Vulnerabihties and Long -Term Priorities, Council on Competitiveness.
  • 6B.Van Ark, Productivity and Competitiveness in Manufacturing: A Comparison of Europe, Japan and the United States, International Productivity Difference edited by K.Wagner and B.Van Ark, 1996, North Holland, Amsterdam,the Netherlands.
  • 7Bert G.Hickman, 1992, International Productivity and Competitiveness, New York, Oxford.
  • 8Daniel F.Burton Jr.1994, Competitiveness: Here to Stay.The Washington Quarterly.
  • 9Michael Porter, 1998, On Competition , Havard Business School Press.
  • 10Michael Porter.《国家竞争优势》,华夏出版社,2002年.

共引文献31

同被引文献1288

引证文献102

二级引证文献1505

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部