期刊文献+

上市公司质量信息披露中的作假分析 被引量:4

The Information Revelation Skullduggery Analysis of the Financial Intermediary and the Listed Company
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过建立金融中介公司和上市公司在信息披露中的非线性激励相容模型,对上市公司的真实资产质量和政府规定的上市公司再融资价格对上市公司质量信息披露中作假的影响进行了定量分析。 The paper has established the prompting model between financial intermediary, and the listed company. Analyzed the true and the prescriptive quality by government how to influence the present phenomena that listed company colluded financial intermediary to reveal the artificial information.
出处 《系统工程理论方法应用》 2004年第2期153-156,共4页 Systems Engineering Theory·Methodology·Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金重大资助项目(79990580)
关键词 上市公司 质量信息披露 作假行为 会计信息质量 listed company financial intermediaries information revelation skullduggery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Lizzei A. Information revelation and certification intermediaries[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1999,30:214-231.
  • 2Datar, Srikant. Susan Kulp, Richard Lambert. Balancing performance measure [R]. Working Paper,1999.
  • 3Watts R L, Zimmerman J L. Agency problems, Auditing and the theory of the firm: some evidence[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1983,26:613-633.
  • 4平新乔 李自然.上市公司信息披露中的勾结问题[DB/OL].http://www.ccer.pku.edu.cn,2002-11-27.
  • 5王浣尘,张文桥,陈明义.论风险承担与公司治理[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,9(4):57-60. 被引量:5

二级参考文献8

  • 1费方域.控制内部人控制:国企改革中的治理机制研究[J].经济研究,1996,31(6):31-39. 被引量:129
  • 2[1]张维迎.企业理论与中国企业改革[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
  • 3[7]Cose Ronald. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economica,1937, (4) :386-405.
  • 4[8]Fama Eugene F. Agency Problems and teh Theory of the Firm. [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980,88:288-307.
  • 5[9]Fama Eugene F. and Jensen Michael. Agency Problems and Residual Claims [J]. Journal of Law and Economics. 1983,26: 327-349.
  • 6[10]Jensen Michael C. and Meckling William N. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownersphip Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics. 1976, (3): 305-360.
  • 7[11]Fama Eugene F. nad Jensen Michael C. Separation of Ownership and Control [J]. Journal of Law and Economcs. 1983,26: 301-325.
  • 8杨瑞龙.应扬弃“股东至上主义”的逻辑[N].中国经济时报,1999-09—10.

共引文献6

同被引文献20

  • 1王艳,沈惠璋,王浣尘.博弈分析框架下上市公司质量监控研究[J].工业工程与管理,2004,9(5):53-57. 被引量:1
  • 2陈工孟,高宁.我国证券监管有效性的实证研究[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):40-47. 被引量:109
  • 3杨柏.上市公司信息披露违规行为监管博弈分析[J].管理世界,2005,21(8):151-152. 被引量:26
  • 4Grossman Stiglitz. On the impossibility of informationally effieient markets [J]. American Economic Review, 1980, 70(3):393-408.
  • 5Diamond Verrecchia. Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital[J].Journal of Finance, 1991, 46(4):1325-1359.
  • 6Brown B C. Differential information and security market equilibrium [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1985, 20(4) :407-422.
  • 7Fama E, French K. The cross-section of expected returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 1992, 47(2) :427-465.
  • 8Botosan Plumlee. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, 40 (1):21 - 40.
  • 9Garleanu. Adverse selection and the required return[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2004, 17 (3) : 643-659.
  • 10Easley D, O'Hara M. Information and the cost of capital[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(4):1553-1582.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部