摘要
科学经常被视为人类合理性的典范,但随着库恩的历史主义的兴起,这一观点受到了颇多挑战。论文分析了逻辑实证论、波普、牛顿一史密斯以及劳丹等人的合理性概念,并指出了其中的不足。作者试图寻找波普“批判理性主义”中更为根本的精神,最终将合理性分析为批判性。科学是理性的,因为科学共同体对自己的价值观、方法论、理论都持批判的态度。对“批判”概念的进一步哲学探讨,将最终揭示合理性的内涵。
Science is usually regarded as the paradigm of human rationality. But with the rise of Kuhn' s historicism, the point greets many challenges. The paper criticizes the points of Logical Positivists, Popper, Newton - Smith, and Laudan. The author tries to find the fundamental position of Popper's Critical Rationalism,' and then analyze rationality as criticism. Science is rational because scientific communities hold a critical attitude to their aims, methods, and theories. The further philosophical research of the concept of critique may bring to light the very nature of rationality.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第2期36-42,共7页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature