期刊文献+

非典型腺上皮细胞的研究进展 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期284-285,共2页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kurman R, Solomon D.The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnosis: definition, criteria and explanatory notes for terminology and specimen adequacy. New York: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, 1994.1-81
  • 2Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 2002, 287: 2114-2119.
  • 3Tam KF, Cheung AN, Liu KL, et al. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification. Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 91:603-607.
  • 4Duska LR, Flynn C, Chen A, et al. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 91: 278-282.
  • 5Hendsch SA, Glover SD, Otis CN,et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance from extramammary Paget′s of the bladder. Obstet Gynecol , 2002, 99(5 Suppl 1): 912-914.
  • 6Eltabbakh GH, Lipman JN, Mount SL, et al. Significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears. Gynecol Oncol, 2000, 78: 245-250.
  • 7Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 180: 883-888.
  • 8Eddy GL, Strumpf KB, Wojtowycz MA, et al. Biopsy findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance as defined by the Bethesda system .Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177:1188-1195.
  • 9Geier CS, Wilson M, Creasman W. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 184: 64-69.
  • 10Chhieng DC, Elgert PA, Cangiarella JF, et al. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytol, 2000, 44:557-566.

同被引文献23

  • 1张江宇,赖日权,张佳立,吴坤河,彭秀红,郜红艺,何平花.宫颈液基细胞学涂片假阴性原因分析[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2005,21(6):663-665. 被引量:29
  • 2童剑倩,王玉东,罗来敏,陆丽华.宫腔镜检查对宫腔内病变的诊断价值[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(3):217-218. 被引量:56
  • 3谢雯.不典型鳞状上皮细胞的临床意义及高危型HPV-DNA检测的分流作用[J].实用预防医学,2007,14(3):906-907. 被引量:2
  • 4Solomon D, Nayar R. The bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes[M]. 2nd ed. New York : Springer-- Verlag, 2004 : 125-133.
  • 5Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undrtermined significance in cervical cytologic findings[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,180 : 883- 888.
  • 6Eddy GI, Strurnpf KB, Wojtowycz MA, et at. Biopay findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance as defined by the Bethesds system[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1997,177:1188 -1195.
  • 7Wright TC,Cox JJT,Massad LS,et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. AJOG,2003,189:295- 304.
  • 8Wright TC,Cox JJT,Massad LS,et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnomalities[J]. JAMA, 2002,287 : 2120-2129.
  • 9Linasmita V, Bullangpoti s, Rochanawutanon M, et al. Assessment of endocervical curettage in colposcopy[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 1990,73 : 28-32.
  • 10Chhieng DC,Elgert P,Cohen JM,et al. Clinical implicatiens ef atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, favor endometrial origin[J]Cancer, 2001,93 : 351-356.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部