期刊文献+

社会保障体制改革中的美国经历与中国道路 被引量:11

Pattern of the Transition of Social Security System in USA and Its Implications to China
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章在总结美国20余年来社会保障体制改革的理论和实践的基础上,分析了美国社会保障体制的优势和缺陷,并且指出表面上的美国社会保障体制危机所蕴含的深刻的制度性危机及其原因。提出了在市场经济中,统一的社会保障体制的生命周期大约为100年的理论假说。在对比了中美社会经济背景3个方面差异的基础上,提出中国在改革和建立社会保障体制的道路上必须留意到的5个方面启示。 This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the US social security system by reviewing its reform practice and theoretical researches in the last two decades. From the perspective of special social circumstances and functions of a social security system, the paper gives an in-depth exploration into the internal and institutional causes of American crisis of social security system besides its external causes. The paper hypothesizes that in a market economy, any unified social security system generally lasts about 100 years. Six aspects should be noticed during the reform and rebuilting of China's social security system while taking the different social and economic backgrounds of the US and China into consideration.
作者 王诚
出处 《中国人口科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期22-32,共11页 Chinese Journal of Population Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[8]Atkinson, A.B. and Mogensen, G.V.(1993), Welfare and Work Incentives: A North European Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 2[9]Attanasio, O.P. and DeLeire T.(2002), The Effect of Individual Retirement Accounts on Household Consumption and National Savings, The Economic Journal, 112, 481,July.
  • 3[10]Coile and Gruber(2001), The Effect of Social Security on Retirement in the United States, NBER Papers, March.
  • 4[11]Cutler, D.M.(2002), Equality, Efficiency, and Market Fundamentals: The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform, Journal of Economic Literature, XL, Sept.
  • 5[12]Ferrara, P.(1997),The Failed Critique of Personal Accounts, Cato Briefing Paper, No. 68, October 8.
  • 6[13]Freeman, R.B., Topel, and Swedenborg(1997), The Welfare State in Transition: Reforming the Swedish Model. Chicago: The University of Chicago Pr.
  • 7[14]Gruber, J. and D.A. Wise(ed.)(2002), Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro Estimation. Pre-pub. Draft. NBER Series, July.
  • 8[15]Michl, T.(2002), Prefunding Is Still the Answer, Challenge, May-June.
  • 9[16]Palley, T.(2002), Social Security: Prefunding Is Not the Answer!, Challenge, March-April.
  • 10[17]Pear, R.(2003), Bush to Propose Changes in Medicare Plan, New York Times, Jan.4.

同被引文献76

引证文献11

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部