期刊文献+

从逻辑全知问题认定看当前基于逻辑的agent研究的两个认识盲点 被引量:1

Two Blind Spots in Recent Logic-Based Agent Study Inferred from the Declaration of Logical Omniscience Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对当前逻辑全知问题的认定过程进行仔细的分析和严格的逻辑论证后发现,这一结论的得出主要来源于人们关于模态逻辑用于agent研究的两点模糊认识,在此基础上进一步指出,如果承认逻辑推理的过程意义,并且不用意识系统的特征来约束逻辑系统,那么就不会有真正意义上的逻辑全知问题存在,该结论无疑对当前基于模态逻辑的agent形式化研究具有十分重要的意义。 Through detail analysis and strict argumentation about two main premises based upon that scholars give the declaration of logical omniscience problem, it was found that the conclusion was made in fact according to two obscure ideas related with the approach to agent study based upon modal logic. From those it is pointed out that, if we admit logical reasoning is in fact an executing process of a studied agent or computer, and if we do not reduce an intentional system as a pure logical system, there surely will not be logical omniscience problem, which is an important conclusion for the vigorous study about agent based upon modal logic.
出处 《北京科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第2期215-218,共4页 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing
基金 国防科技跨行业基金(No.OOJ16.6.3.JW040)
关键词 逻辑全知问题 AGENT 逻辑推理实现 意识系统 可能世界语义 模态逻辑 modal logic possible world semantics logical omniscience problem intentional system agent-based realization of logical reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bradshaw W. An introduction to software agents [A]. In:Bradshaw M. Software Agents [C]. Menlo Park, CA:AAAI Press, 1997.
  • 2Singh M P. Multiagent Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Intention, Know-how, and Communication [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
  • 3Dennett D C. The Intentional Stance [M]. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press, 1987.
  • 4Wooldridge M J, Jennings N R. Intelligent agents: theory and practice [J]. Knowl Eng Rev, 1995, 10(2): 115
  • 5Rao A S, GeorgeffM P. BDI agent: from theory to practice [A]. Georgeff M P, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95) [C].San Francisco: ACM Press, 1995. 312
  • 6Levesque H J. A logic of implicit and explicit belief [A].Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-84) [C]. Austin, TX, 1984
  • 7Konolige K. A Deduction Model of Belief [M]. London and San Mateo, CA: Pitman Publishing and Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.
  • 8刘大有,杨鲲,陈建中.Agent研究现状与发展趋势[J].软件学报,2000,11(3):315-321. 被引量:313
  • 9杨鲲,陈建中,孙德刚,刘大有.认知逻辑中逻辑全知问题及其解决方法[J].吉林大学自然科学学报,1999(3):40-43. 被引量:11
  • 10程显毅,石纯一.避免逻辑全知的BDI语义[J].软件学报,2002,13(5):966-971. 被引量:6

二级参考文献6

共引文献334

同被引文献8

  • 1刘勇,蒲树祯,程代杰,曹泽翰.BDI模型信念特性研究[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(1):54-59. 被引量:7
  • 2Blackburn P, de Rijke M, Venema Y. Modal Logic [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2001
  • 3Kripke S. Semantic Analysis of Modal Logic Ⅱ : Non-Normal Modal Propositional Calculi. In: Symposium on the Theory of Models,North-Holland,Amsterdam, 1965
  • 4Konolige K. A Deduction Model of Belief. Pitman, London and Morgan Kaufmarm, San Mateo, CA, 1986
  • 5SHI Zhongzhi,TIAN Qijia, LI Yunfeng. RAO Logic for Multiagent Framework. Journal of Computer Science and Technology,1999,14(4) : 393-400
  • 6田启家,史忠植,王怀清.多主体系统中的动作和知识推理.见:第四届中国人工智能联合学术会议论文集(96人工智能进展).清华大学出版社,1996.74-79
  • 7王文杰,田启家,史忠植.多主体系统中对其它主体的研究[J].计算机研究与发展,1998,35(11):971-974. 被引量:7
  • 8杨鲲,陈建中,孙德刚,刘大有.认知逻辑中逻辑全知问题及其解决方法[J].吉林大学自然科学学报,1999(3):40-43. 被引量:11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部