试辨康德界定审美活动的偏误

Differentiating the Deviation which Immanuel Kant Defined the Aesthetic Activity

康德从其人学研究的总体出发定位审美活动,虽然拓开了超越前人的新视界,但是他对第三《批判》究竟是作为整个批判哲学体系的合题还是作为中介环节自己也长期存有犹疑。由于康德首先关注的是体系的建构而不是研究对象本身,专心一意要沟通自然与自由、知性与理性等对立领域,将诸范畴之间的平行关系与层次关系混合为一体,因而造成其论述的某些偏误。审美学必须从康德走向黑格尔,真正以艺术为主要研究对象,才有可能顺理成章地解决康德美学遗留下来的系列问题。

Immanuel Kant orientated the aesthetic activity from his overall research of anthropology.Though he opened up the new visual field that exceeded the predecessors, over a long period of time, but he was dubious whether his third critique was regarded as the synthesis of all his philosophy-criticizing or as an intermediary link. Because Immanuel Kant was first concerned not about the research object itself, but about the construction of his philosophy. Therefore,he made a concentrated effort to collude with the antithesis fields, such as nature and freedom, intellectual and rational, etc, so as to integrate the parallel and vertical relation of all its categories into a whole, which result in the deviation of his discussion. Aesthetics must be developed from Immanuel Kant to W.F.Hegel, regarding the art as the main research object. Only in the case maybe it successfully solve the series of problems that I.Kant's aesthetics had left over.