英语学习者话语标记语语用石化现象初探——基于真实口语语料的调查分析被引量：54

On Pragmatic Fossilization in English Learners' Acquisition of Discourse Markers—An Investigation Based on Natural Spoken English Data

下载PDF

导出

摘要对抽样调查中的中国高级和中级英语学习者以及英语为母语者真实口语语料的对比分析表明:英语学习者在话语标记语的习得上无法达到英语为母语者的同等水平,存在语用石化现象。本次调查结果说明,语用石化现象也是二语教学中不可忽视的问题。 Based on natural spoken English data, the present study makes a comparison on the application of English discourse markers between Chinese English learners and native speakers. It leads to the conclusion that, compared with native speakers, Chinese English learners are in a state of pragmatic fossilization in the learning process of discourse markers. The study demonstrates that pragmatic fossilization poses a problem to tackle in second language learning and teaching.

作者李巧兰

机构地区厦门大学外文学院

出处《解放军外国语学院学报》北大核心 2004年第3期53-57,71,共6页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages

关键词话语标记语语用石化英语学习者 discourse markers pragmatic fossilization English learners

分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1<疯狂英语>编辑部.互动访谈[MT].广州:广东省语言音像出版社.
2<疯狂英语>编辑部.21世纪·爱立信杯第七届全国英语演讲比赛[MT].江西:江西文化音像出版社,2002.
3冉永平.话语标记语well的语用功能[J].外国语,2003,26(3):58-64. 被引量：280
4Andersen, Gisle. The role of the pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretation [A]. Eds. Andersen, Gisle &Thorstein Fretheim. Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. 17 -38.
5Fuller. Janet M. The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, (2003) 35: 23-45.
6Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv Yael. Discourse Markers:Introduction [A]. Eds. Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv Yael.Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [C].Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. 1 - 12.
7Jucker, Andreas H. & Sara W. Smith. And people just you know like 'wow': Discourse Markers as Negotiating Stragegies [ A]. Eds. Andreas H. & Ziv Yael. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998. 171 - 201.
8Kasper, Gabriele & Shoshana Blum-Kulka. Interlanguage Pragmatics: An Introduction [A]. Eds. Kasper, Gabriele & Shoshana Blum-Kulka. Lnterlanguage Pragmatics [C].Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.3 - 16.
9Schmidt, Richard. Consciousness, Learning and Interlanguage Pragmatics [A].Eds. Kasper, Gabriele &,Shoshana Blum-Kulka. Interlanguage Pragmatics [C].Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.21 -42.
10Selinker, Lorry. Rediscovering Interlanguage [M].London & New York: Longman, 1992.

二级参考文献16

1Blakemore, D. The organization of discourse[A]. E J. Newmeyer. Linguistics: The Cambridge University Press[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. VoI.IV: 229-250.
2Blakemore, D. Are apposition markers discourse markers[J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1996, (32):325-347.
3Blass, R. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala[C].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
4Brown, P. & S, Levinson. Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena[A], Ester N. Goody.Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. 56-289.
5Fraser, Bruce. Conversational mitigation[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1980, (4): 341-350.
6Jucker, Andreas H. The discourse marker Well: A relevant-theoretical account[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1993, (19): 435-452.
7Lakoff, R. Questionable answers and answerable questions[A]. B. B. Kachru, et al. Issues in Linguistics[C]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1973. 453-467.
8Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London:Longnum, 1983.
9Levinson, S. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1983.
10Quirk, R. et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[C]. London: Longman, 1985.