期刊文献+

不同尺度下影响水土流失地形因子指标的分析与选取 被引量:36

Analysis and selection of topographical indices influencing soil loss on different scales
下载PDF
导出
摘要  回顾了国内外土壤侵蚀模型中不同地形指标及地形因子的提取技术,认为无论是统计模型还是物理模型,其采用的地形指标均局限于坡面或沟道,而对大尺度范围内的地形因子研究较少。本研究根据地貌学意义和水土保持学意义的不同,以宏观水土流失评价与预测为目的,主要选取了宏观尺度上的地形指标,认为坡度是微观尺度(如1∶1万,1∶5万)的最佳应用指标,而在宏观尺度上(如1∶100万)则可选择地形起伏度、河网密度、地形粗糙度和高程变异系数等作为分析指标。 Landform is one of the most important factors influencing soil loss.Developing and establishing soil erosion models is an important approach to monitor and evaluate soil loss and soil and water conservation.However,for different scales and different purposes of research,the topographic factors to be considered are selected differently.In this paper,firstly,the topographical indices employed in international and domestic soil erosion models and their extraction technology are reviewed.The result of the review suggests that,regardless of the models employed,be they statistic models based on the experimental materials or models based on the soil erosion mechanism,the topographical indices used mostly derive from small areas such as slope land or small watersheds.Research at the regional scale has been limited.Based on the analysis of significance in geomorphology and soil erosion,this paper concludes that slope gradient is the optimal index used in micro-scale research.Relief,drainage networks density,landform roughness and variance coefficient in elevation,which are regional characteristics,are better used in macro-scale research.However,to determine which regional index or indices are optimal in a specific macro-scale study,concrete research or experimentation must be carried out.
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期107-111,共5页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程项目"区域水土保持环境效应与生态环境建设对策(KZCX1-10-04-01) 西北农林科技大学青年专项"陕北丘陵沟壑区水土流失地形因子分析与提取
关键词 水土流失 地形因子 尺度 土壤侵蚀模型 数字高程模型 soil loss scales topographical indices DEM
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Meyer L D.Evoluation of the universal soil loss equation[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1984,(3-4):99-104.
  • 2Stephens P R.Estimating universal soil loss equation factor values with aerial photography[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1985,(5-6):293-296.
  • 3Kennech G R,George R F,Gelnn A W,et al.RUSLE Revised universal soil loss equation[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(1):30-33.
  • 4Renard K G.Prediction soil erosion by water:a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil equation (RUSLE)[M].USDA:Agr Handbook,1997.703.
  • 5John M L,Leonard J L,George R F.WEPP.A new generation of erosion prediction technology[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(1):34-38.
  • 6Roo de A p J,Hazelhoff L,Burrough P A.Soil erosion modeling using ANSWERS and geographical information system[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1980,14:517-532.
  • 7Dennis L C,Keith L,Timothy R E.GIS.based modeling of non.pointed source pollution in the vadose zone[J].J of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,53(1):34-38.
  • 8Udoyara S T,Robert J.Evaluating agricultural nonpoint.source pollution using integrated geographical information system and hydrologic/water quality model[J].J Environ Qual,1994,23:25-35.
  • 9John C P,Ian D M,Larry A K.Terrain analysis:integration into the agricultural nonpoint source (AGNPS) pollution model[J].J Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(1):59-64.
  • 10Stephens P R.Estimating universal soil loss equation factor values with aerial photography[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1985,(5-6):293-296.

二级参考文献86

共引文献1306

同被引文献470

引证文献36

二级引证文献368

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部