期刊文献+

对工业噪声致听力损伤的临床研究 被引量:11

Clinical study on hearing damage in industrical noise exposure workers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :对噪声暴露工人 0 .5kHz~ 16kHz畸变产物耳声发射 (DPOAE)和扩展高频测听进行研究。探讨工业噪声对作业人员听功能的影响 ,以期早期发现 ,早期干预。方法 :用精密积分声级计记录北京人民机器厂机加工车间噪声强度及频谱分布 ,对 4 2例耳科正常人和 2 0例噪声暴露工人进行 0 .5kHz~ 16kHzDPOAE、常频纯音测听 (0 .5kHz~ 8kHz)及扩展高频测听 (9kHz~ 16kHz)检查 ,比较DPOAE和纯音测听的结果。结果 :生产车间噪声强度为 87dB~ 95dBSPL(A) ,噪声频谱以 0 .5kHz~ 2kHz为主。噪声暴露工人纯音听阈在6kHz处和扩展高频区升高明显 ,DPOAE幅值在 4、6kHz和 11.2kHz处较正常组明显下降 ,而在 12 .5、14、16kHz三个频率二组几无差异。随着暴露噪声中的工龄延长 ,噪声暴露工人纯音听阈逐渐升高 ,DPOAE幅值逐渐降低。结论 :长期暴露在工业噪声下可引起作业工人噪声性听力损失 ,且暴露时间对听力的影响具有累积作用。常频DPOAE检查及扩展高频测听均可用于噪声性聋的早期诊断和监测。DPOAE的产生部位和机制尚需深入研究。 Objective: To investigate the result of distortion product otoacoustic emissions(DPOAE)and expanded high frequency audiometry in noise exposure workers. Methods: DPOAE, conventional pure tone audiometry and expanded high frequency audiometry were examined in 42 young adults with normal hearing and 20 noise exposure workers. DPOAE amplitudes, conventional pure tone hearing thresholds and expanded high frequency hearing thresholds were compared. Results: In noise exposure workers against young adults with normal hearing, the pure tone hearing thresholds at 6 kHz and expanded high frequency area declined significantly,DPOAE amplitudes at frequency from 4 to 6 kHz and 11.2 kHz declined obviowly too,but there existed no significantly difference at frequency from 12.5 to 16 kHz between the two groups. Conclusion:DPOAE is potential implement to early diagnose and detect noise-induced deafness. The originated area and mechanism of DPOAE should be solved by further studies.
出处 《中日友好医院学报》 2004年第2期67-72,共6页 Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital
关键词 工业噪声 听力损伤 畸变产物耳声发射 诊断 耳聋 hearing disorders hearing loss,noise-induced distortion product otoacoustic emissions expanded high frequency
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

  • 1Wu W,Exp Neurol,1993年,120卷,153页
  • 2Gorga MP, Ncely ST, Bergman B, et al. Otoacostic emissions from normal hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: disiortion product responses[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1993, 93:2050.
  • 3Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman B, et al. A comparison of transientevoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1993, 94:2639.
  • 4Kim DO, Paparello J, Jung MD, Surzynski J, et al. Distortion product Otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarditg sensitivity, specific ty and receiver operating characteristics [J]. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 1996, 116: 3.
  • 5Attias J, Bresloff I, Reshef I, et ai. Evaluating noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions [ J ]. Br J Audiol, 1998, 32: 39.
  • 6Martin GK, Ohlms LA, Franklin DJ, et al. Distortion product emissions in humans Ⅲ . Influence of sensorineural hearing loss[J] Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1990, 99: 30.
  • 7Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions[J]. Audiol, 1993, 32: 12.
  • 8Bonfils P, Avan P, Elbez M, et al. Auditory threshold evaluation by distortion product otoacoustic emission using decision support system [J]. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 1994, 114: 360.
  • 9Moulin A, Bera JC, Collet L. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Audiol, 1994, 33: 305.
  • 10Arnold DJ,Lonsbury-Martin BL,MarlinGk.High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion product otoacousticemissions[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1999,125:215.

共引文献65

同被引文献59

引证文献11

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部