期刊文献+

基于对Leopold-Wolman关系修正的河床河型判别 被引量:8

Channel Pattern Discrimination Based on the Relationship Between Channel Slope and Width
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在广泛收集中国和世界上冲积河流资料的基础上,以近200条河流的大样本对著名的、国际上沿用40余年的Leopold-Wolman关系,即用于河型判别的比降-流量关系进行了检验。结果发现,该关系不能用于包括砾石与砂质河床在内的河型判别。这是由于比降-流量关系主要反映砾石河床与砂质河床之间差异,其次才反映分汊与弯曲河型之间的差异。为此,对于Leopold-Wolman关系进行了改进,提出了以比降和河宽来判别河型的新关系。这一关系综合反映了河流在纵向上的能耗、阻力与输沙特性与在横向上的流场与环流分布特性的组合关系,因而具有更好的河型判别效果,可以用于包括砾石与砂质河床在内的河型判别。 The classic channel slope-discharge relationship proposed by Leopold and Wolman (1957) for channel pattern discrimination has been tested by a large database including 4 types of rivers: gravel-bed meandering, gravel-bed braided, sand-bed meandering and sand-bed braided rivers. The result shows that the Leopold-Wolman relationship cannot discriminate channel patterns well when both gravel- and sand-bed rivers are considered. It is indicated that the Leopold-Wolman relationship reflects the difference between gravel- and sand-bed rivers more than the difference between meandering and braided channel patterns. The channel width-bankfull discharge relationship for discrimination channel patterns of sand-bed rivers in China is also tested in this stud. The result shows that the channel width-discharge relationship discriminates channel patterns better than the slope-discharge relationship. To improve the Leopold-Wolman relationship, a diagram based on the channel slope-bankfull width relationship is proposed. This diagram shows that the slope-width plane is divided by two straight-lines into 4 areas, with each type of river located in each area. Hence, the two straight lines can be regarded as the thresholds between the 4 types of rivers: gravel-bed meandering, gravel-bed braided, sand-bed meandering and the sand-bed braided patternes.
作者 许炯心
出处 《地理学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期462-467,共6页 Acta Geographica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(49970014) 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所知识创新工程项目(CXIOG-A00-05-01)~~
关键词 河型 砾石河流 沙质河流 比降 河宽 砂质河床 channel pattern gravel-bed river sand-bed river channel pattern discrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1957, 282B: 39-85.
  • 2Schumm S A, Khan H R, Winkley B R et al. Variability of river patterns. Nature, 1972, 237: 75-76.
  • 3Schumm S A. Evolution and response of the fluvial system: sedimentologic implications. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 1981, No.31: 9-29.
  • 4Brice J C. Planform properties of meandering rivers, in river meandering. Proceedings of Conference Rivers' 83,American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1984, 1-15.
  • 5Shen Yuchang, Gong Guoyuan. A General Introduction to Fluvial Geomorphology. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.
  • 6Henderson F M. Stability of alluvial channels. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1963, (128): 657-686.
  • 7Ferguson R I. The threshold between meandering and braiding. In: K V H Smith (ed.), Channels and Channel Control Structures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984. 6.15-6.29.
  • 8Parker G. On the cause and characteristic scales of meandering and braiding in riven. J. Fluid Mech., 1976, 76: 457-480.
  • 9Xu Jiongxin. The comparison of and geomorphological implication to water currents and energy comsumption of sandy and gravel channel beds.Chinese Science Bulletin,1999,42(1):74-78.[许炯心.沙质河床与砾石河床水流及能耗特
  • 10Carson M A. The meandering-braided river threshold: a reappraisal. Journal of Hydrology, 1984, 73:315-334.

同被引文献112

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部