期刊文献+

再论司法与仲裁的关系——关于法院应否监督仲裁实体内容的立法与实践模式及理论思考 被引量:39

原文传递
导出
摘要 法院应否监督仲裁的实体内容 ,理论界向有争议。通说认为 ,法院只能在监督与不监督之间选择 ,但目前有关国家的立法与实践已提供了多种选择模式 ,包括法院强制监督仲裁实体的模式、任意监督仲裁实体的模式、不监督仲裁实体的模式、原则上不监督但在当事人协议同意时可监督仲裁实体的模式。本文赞同上述最后一种监督模式 ,因为该模式体现了对当事人意思自治的充分尊重 ,同时又在仲裁的价值取向上达成了仲裁的终局性与公正性之间的平衡。本文还认为 ,中国的仲裁立法改革应超越“程序监督论”与“实体监督论” ,还当事人真正的意思自治权。
出处 《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期60-69,共10页 Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 34.
  • 2Articles 34 and 36 of the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law.
  • 3P Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice- A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 33.
  • 4P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 28.
  • 5L. Goldman, Contractually Expanded Review of Arbitration Awards, 8 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 171 (Spring 2003).
  • 6W H Knull, III and N. D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option? 11 The American Review of International Arbitration 531 (2000).
  • 7T J Klitgaard, The Transnational Arbitration of High-Tech Disputes, presentation given to the 7th Annual Transnational Commercial Arbitration of Workshop, Dallas, Texas, June 20 1996. Available at http://www, wirepaladln, com/articles/article9, htm.
  • 8A. Redfem and M. Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (3rd Edtion), London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999, p. 434.
  • 9J. Hill, The Law Relating To International Commercial Disputes (2nd Edtion), LLP Reference Publishing, 1998, p. 618.
  • 10S K Huber and E W Trachte- Huber, International ADR in the 1990's: the Top Ten Developments, 1 Houston Business & Tax Law Journal 184 (2001).

二级参考文献18

共引文献126

同被引文献305

引证文献39

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部