摘要
行政审判对具体行政行为事实审查的标准不是《行政诉讼法》第61条规定的“事实清楚”,而是第54条规定的“主要证据充分”,法院不应以自己对事实的判断代替行政机关对事实的认定。行政审判中的认证标准是法律,行政机关的“心证”不受法院审查。行政判决书中法院查明的事实不是引起争议的事实,而是行政执法程序等事实。
The standard of examination of facts in administrative trial is that 'the evidence for undertaking a specific administrative act is conclusive' prescribed in article 61 of administrative litigation law rather than 'facts are clearly ascertained' in article 54. The court shall not substitute its decision of facts for administrative agencies' cognizance of facts. The standard of authentication in administrative trial is law. Administrative agencies' conviction shall not be examined by the court. The facts ascertained in court verdict shall be the facts about the procedure of administrative law enforcement rather than the facts in dispute.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第2期108-113,共6页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW