期刊文献+

对银行业分业与混业经营之争的评述 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 银行业应是分业还是混业经营一直是个争论不休的问题。本文在分析了分业与混业之争后 ,认为从理论的角度来看 ,分业与混业各有优劣 ,并不能得出孰优孰劣的定论。商业银行经营制度的变迁 ,并不必然地意味着一个“优胜劣汰”的过程 ,更多体现的是一种“重心转移”
作者 陈建斌
出处 《南方经济》 北大核心 2004年第5期74-76,共3页 South China Journal of Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1黄毅 杜要忠译.《美国金融现代化法案》[M].中国金融出版社,..
  • 2Ang,J and T Richdson, 1994. "The Underwriting Experience of Commercial bank Affiliates Prior to the Glass-Steall Act: A Re-examination of Evideftce for Passage of the Act. "Journal of Banking and Finance 18.351-95.
  • 3Barth, J, G Caprio Jr and R Levine, 2001. "Banking Systems around the Globe: Do Regulation and Ownership Affect Perfornmnce and Stability?" In Mishkin, F S (ed), Prudential Supervision: What Works and What doesn' t? The Universityd Chicago Press.
  • 4Beaston, G, 1990. The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking. New york: Mcmillan.
  • 5Calomiris, W, 2000. United States Bank Deregulation in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Gande, A, M Puri, and A Satmders, 1999. "Bank Entry, Competition, and the Market for Corporate Securities Underwriting. Journal of Finascial Economics 54.165-195.
  • 7Gande, A, Puri, A Saunders and I Walter. "Bank Underwriting of Debt securities: Modem Evidence. "Review of financial studies 10, No 4,1997.
  • 8Kanatas,G and Jianping Qi, 2002. "Integration of Lending and Underwriting: Implication of Scope Ecanamies. Rice University Working Paper.
  • 9Kanishi, M, 2002. "Bared Underwriting by and Conflict of Interest: Evidence from Japan During the Pre-war Period". Jounud of Banking and Finance . 767 -793.
  • 10Kroszner,R,and R Rajan ,1994. "Is the Glass-steagal Act Justified? A Study of the U S Experieace with Universal Banking bdore 1933. "Ameaica Economic Review 84.810-32.

共引文献26

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部