哲学史类型与中国思想的叙述方式

The Type of Philosophical History and the Narration of Chinese Thought

当前发生的"中国哲学合法性危机"并不是某种外在尺度衡定的结果,而是中国思想之自我表达的"哽咽"状态所引起的内在的深切反思:由中国思想之叙述方式的困惑到话语形式之主体性缺失的焦虑。从哲学史类型来看,百年的"中国哲学"建构史做出了种种尝试,积累了相当的经验,这些方式有的已被淘汰或可能废弃,而有些则会在未来的中国哲学建设中继续发挥作用。在可选择的多元化的叙述方式中,中国思想的丰富性和独特性将会得到更好的呈现,其"失语"的状态也有望得到改变。

The present crisis of Chinese philosophy is the self-reflection of the 'choking' condition of Chinese thought expression owing to the confusion of the narration of Chinese thought and the lack of subject in expression. From the types of philosophical history, some of the attempts in the construction of the history of Chinese philosophy for the hundred years may prove to be helpful in the future construction of Chinese philosophy while others may be abandoned. The richness and uniqueness of Chinese thought should be better revealed and the 'murmuring' condition should be changed in the multiple narrations.