摘要
天然气水合物是一种潜在的巨大能源,目前普遍认为它存在的重要标志之一是地震剖面上的拟海底反射(BSR),因此研究天然气水合物层的物性和研究含天然气水合物层顶、底界面的AVO特征就有着重要的现实意义。目前的AVO方法主要是利用单相介质理论,但实际的地层都是含有流体的多孔隙介质,因此利用双相介质理论研究分界面上的AVO特征是非常必要的。Ecker提出了水合物沉积的3种微观模式:①水合物是流体的一部分;②水合物是固体骨架的一部分;③水合物胶结固体颗粒接触面。利用单相介质理论和双相介质理论分别计算了上述3种含天然气水合物地层,以及同样条件下不含水合物地层与含游离气地层分界面上的反射和透射系数,并对单相介质理论和双相介质理论的计算结果进行了对比。对比发现,在地震勘探的低频范围内,第1种和第2种模式的反射和透射系数非常相似,二者的差值随孔隙度的增大而增大,第3种模式的AVO曲线表现出和前2种模式完全不同的特点,可以根据这种特点把它与前2种模式区分开来。
Gas hydrate is a kind of potentially energy The
'bottom simulating reflectors', (BSR) on seismic sec-
tions are generally accepted as an indicator of the ex-
istence of gas hydrate. Understanding of the proper-
ties of hydrate-bearing layers and study of the AVO
characteristics of BSR are of great significance. Sin-
gle-phase medium theory is commonly used in AVO
analysis at present, but natural media are actually
porous and fluid-bearing. Ecker proposed three micro
mechanical models of hydrate formation. Hydrate is
a part of pore fluid, a part of solid matrix, or hydrate
cements grain contacts. Based on single-and two-
phase medium theory, we calculated the reflection
coefficients and the transmission coefficients on an
interface between two layers, among which one is
without hydrate and the other is with free gas in the
three models. Calculation shows that in the seismic
frequency range, the reflection coefficients and the
transmission coefficients resulted from the first and
second models are very similar. The difference be-
tween them increases with porosity. The third model
generates a completely different AVO curve. There-
fore, the latter can be qualitatively distinguished
from the former.
出处
《石油物探》
EI
CSCD
2004年第3期209-216,共8页
Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum
基金
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目资助(G20000467)