期刊文献+

我国《调查规则》与欧共体TBR比较的思考

A Comparative Study of China's Investigation Rules and E. C.'s TBR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年外国企业利用技术性贸易壁垒,对我国企业产品与技术连续发起狙击,引发国民对破除国外技术贸易壁垒的关注。我国《调查规则》在诉诸报复威胁措施,构成贸易壁垒的“不合理”规定以及司法审查方面存在的问题与不足,应根据不断变化的形势与特点,在司法审查、限制技术性贸易壁垒及贸易壁垒范围与可操作性方面,从国际贸易防卫法的高度对《调查规则》作出具创新意义的修改。 The paper, with a comparative study of China's Investigation Rules and E. C.'s TBR, points out that the former has its deficiency and weak-points in jurisdiction examination, 'unreasonable regulations' in trade barriers as well as in appealing to retaliations and threats. It holds that revisions and amendments should be made to jurisdiction examination, restrictions on technique barriers and the scope of trade barriers, etc. from the perspective of internationa trade protection.
作者 乔生
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期56-59,共4页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 贸易壁垒 技术性贸易壁垒 《调查规则》 TBR 立法创新 trade barriers technique trade barriers Investigation Rules TBR legislation innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Macroc.E J Bronckers, "Private Participation in the Enforcement of WTO Law: the New EC Trade Barriers Regulation", (1996)33 common Market Law Review, P299-318.
  • 2胡慧平.反知识产权垄断 该行动了[Z].,2003/04/27..

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部