期刊文献+

反核生化恐怖与大气科学 被引量:14

Atmospheric Science and Countering Nuclear,Biological and Chemical Terror
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在组成反恐战略诸要素中 ,科技政策是核心要素。“9·1 1”事件后 ,反恐上升为美国科技领域的头号课题 ,政府加大了对科技反恐的投入 ,我国也面临同样的抉择。恐怖活动除了直接实施核生化恐怖威胁之外 ,还通过破坏核生化设施同样达到核生化恐怖的效果 ,甚至比直接实施核生化恐怖更为严重。据调查 ,各大中城市生产使用有毒、有害、易燃、易爆化学物质的工厂占全部工厂的 80 %以上 ,年用量成千上万吨。在恐怖分子应用最多的爆炸和燃烧事件中 ,人员的主要伤亡不是来自于炸伤、烧伤 ,而是因爆炸和燃烧所产生的毒气中毒。研究表明 ,在各种有毒物质传播途径中 ,空气和水体扩散所占比例最大。笔者针对反恐问题 ,论述了大气科学与核生化恐怖的关系 ,重点突出了大气科学。 Science and technology policy is the key factor among all strategic elements against terrorism. Since Sept.11 terror attack, anti terrorism has soared to American banner task, and its government and states have increased their investment in scientific and technological anti terrorism. China is also confronting the same choice. On the one hand, terrorists might directly use nuclear, biological and chemical agents; while on the other hand, they might indirectly carry out terror attack by destroying nuclear, biological or chemical establishments, which might result even much worse. According to surveys, factories and plants, where poisonous, hazardous, flammable and explosive materials and products are produced, occupy over 80% of the total, their annual output might be thousands tons. In addition, main casualties do not caused directly by explosion and fire, but rather from toxicant poisonings resulted from explosion and fire. According to statistics, among various spreading routes for poisonous toxicants, spreading by air and water occupies the biggest ratio. Aiming at anti terrorism, the relationship between atmospheric science and nuclear, biological and chemical terror is discussed with the emphasis on the strategic position of atmospheric science, aerodynamics and hydrodynamics in the research of countering the nuclear, biological and chemical terrors.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2004年第3期3-7,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 中国科学院大气物理研究所大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室LAPC -KF - 2 0 0 3- 1 1。
关键词 核危害 生物制剂 毒剂 放射性污染 核生化恐怖 有毒气体 应急救援措施 恐怖分子 Atmospheric science Anti-terrorism Nuclear Biological Chemical Diffusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1J. Patrick Fitch, Ellen Raber, Dennis R. Imbro. Technology Challenges in Responding to Biological or Chemical Attacks in Civilian Sector[J]. SCIENCE,November 21,2003,302:1350-1354
  • 2James B. Petro and David A. Relman. Understanding Threats to Scientific Openness[J]. SCIENCE, December 12,2003,302:1898
  • 3Amy E.Smithson and Leslie-Anne Levy, the Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response[R]. The Henry L.Stemson Center, pragmatic steps toward ideal objectives(Report No.35), October 2000
  • 4李伟.2002年国际恐怖主义问题综述[J].国际资料信息,2003(1):5-11. 被引量:6
  • 5黄顺祥,胡非,李昕,陈海平,钱毅新.反化学恐怖危害评估[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(1):121-128. 被引量:9
  • 6黄顺祥.[D].北京:中国科学院大气物理研究所,2002.
  • 7黄顺祥 胡非 陈海平.化学恐怖样式及危害评估[A]..2002年度LAPC学术年会暨第二届全国大气边界层战略研讨会[C].北京,2003-3.33-34.
  • 8黄顺祥 陈海平 胡非.反对恐怖主义化学袭击数值模拟初探[A]..第六届全国风工程及工业空气动力学学术会议论文集[C].,2002-9.302-310.

二级参考文献5

共引文献13

同被引文献150

引证文献14

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部