摘要
历代注庄家大量援引佛教和新儒家的理学思想来注解“心斋”,虽往往有失原意,但这种历史“误读”的本身,却有助于我们了解中国思想史中道家与儒、佛两家在心性理论上的同与异。
The interpreters in the past dynasties who always explained the Village to be the concept of 揦inzhai?by quoting large quantities of the idea of the Buddhism and the Confucian School of idealist philosophy. This misreading is helpful for us to comprehend the differences and the combinations among the Taoism, the Confucian school and the Buddhism in the Chinese idea history though it always lost the original intention.
出处
《湖南城市学院学报》
2004年第3期18-20,共3页
Journal of Hunan City Univeristy
关键词
心斋
五蕴俱空
定慧
明诚
动静
Xinzhai
Wu-yun-ju-kong
clear-sighted and honest
activity and movement