期刊文献+

美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版与国际疾病分类第10版诊断为多动综合征患儿的认知功能比较 被引量:26

Comparison of cognitive function between children with hyperactive disorder diagnosed by the 4th edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the 10th edition of International Classification of Diseases criteria
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-Ⅳ)与国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)两种诊断标准诊断为多动综合征患儿的认知功能。方法 对至少符合一种诊断标准的连续282例患儿(其中同时符合两种诊断标准者共130例,仅符合DSM-Ⅳ中ADHD者152例)和94名正常对照儿童进行认知功能测查,并分低年龄段(≤9岁)、中年龄段(10~12岁)和高年龄段(>12岁)比较两患儿组及正常对照三组间认知功能的异同。结果(1)两患儿组韦氏智力测验、韦氏记忆测验和瑞文标准推理测验得分均低于对照组(P<0.01),但两患儿组之间的差异无显著性(P>0.05)。(2)Stroop测验中,低年龄段三组在完成时间、总错误数、字义干扰时差异有非常显著性(P<0.01);中年龄段在完成时间、字义干扰时差异有非常显著性(P<0.01);高年龄段仅完成时间差异有非常显著性(P<0.01)。(3)三组间的低、中年龄段在数字划消测验的总正确数、总遗漏数、总分、平均失误率以及倒背数字得分差异有非常显著性(P<0.01),而高年龄段的组间差异则无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 根据DSM-Ⅳ及ICD-10诊断的多动综合征患儿均存在认知功能损害。 Objective From a viewpoint of cognitive function, to explore the differences between DSM-Ⅳ and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Methods Participants were children referred for symptoms of overactivity, inattention, and impulsivity. The ADHD children were classified into three subtypes according to DSM-Ⅳ criteria, and the symptom comorbidities assessed. The subjects were diagnosed according to ICD-10 hyperkinetic disorder criteria at the same time. All participants received a series of neuropsychological tests including the Chinese-Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (C-WISC), Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) , number cancellation test, Stroop test and Raven's standard progressive matrices. Results Children meeting criteria for both DSM-IV ADHD and ICD-10 hyperkinetic disorder (ADHD/HKD group) were significantly younger than those for ADHD only[ ADHD group; (10. 2 ±2. 2) years vs. (10.9±2.3) years], suggesting an earlier referral age for ADHD/HKD children [(4.8±2.8) years vs. (5. 8±2.5)years]. As to the subtypes, a greater number of children in ADHD/HKD group met criteria for combined subtype (ADHD-C, 78.5%), whereas in ADHD group most met criteria for predominantly inattentive subtype ( ADHD-I, 82.9%). Few differences emerged on cognitive function between both the patient groups, though they all tended to have more cognitive impairments compared to normal children. Conclusions From a viewpoint of cognitive, we consider DSM-Ⅳ diagnostic criteria for ADHD is better than ICD-10.
出处 《中华精神科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第2期103-106,共4页 Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
基金 国家科学技术部攀登计划基金资助项目(95-专-09) 卫生部临床学科重点项目(2001-321)
关键词 美国 精神障碍 诊断 多动综合征 小儿 认知功能 Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity Reference standards Cognition Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Swanson JM, Sergeant JA, Taylor E, et al. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Lancet, 1998, 351:429-433.
  • 2American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.78-85.
  • 3World Health Organization. The international classification of diseases, 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992. 195-196.
  • 4Tripp G, Luk SL, Schaughency EA, et al. DSM-IV and ICD-10: a comparison of the correlates of ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1999, 38:156-164.
  • 5Leung PW, Luk SL, Ho TP, et al. The diagnosis and prevalence of hyperactivity in Chinese schoolboys. Br J Psychiatry, 1996, 168:486-496.
  • 6Nigg JT, Hinshaw SP, Carte ET, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: explainable by comorbid disruptive behavior or reading problems? J Abnorm Psychol, 1998, 107:468-480.
  • 7Klorman R, Hazel-Fernandez LA, Shaywitz SE, et al. Executive functioning deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are independent of oppositional defiant or reading disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1999, 38:1148-1155.
  • 8杨莉,王玉凤,钱秋谨,顾伯美.注意缺陷多动障碍患儿的临床分型初探[J].中华精神科杂志,2001,34(4):204-207. 被引量:84
  • 9龚耀先 蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993..
  • 10龚耀先.中国修订韦氏记忆量表手册[Z].长沙:湖南医科大学(内部资料),1989.33-48.

二级参考文献18

  • 1龚耀先 蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993..
  • 2许淑莲.脑梗塞病人的词语流畅性研究[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1988,21:206-206.
  • 3梁永亮.中国注意缺陷多动障碍样本的评估和诊断.2000年精神病学新进展高级讲习班讲义[M].北京:北京大学精神卫生研究所,国际神经-精神药理学会(CINP),2000..
  • 4王玉凤 曾文星.中国儿童气质特点.华人的心理与治疗[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1997.87-109.
  • 5徐通 苏渊 等.注意障碍多动综合征患儿就诊症状的分析[J].中华精神科杂志,1997,30:256-256.
  • 6顾伯美 王玉凤 等.学习困难与多动症儿童智力因素对照研究[J].北京医科大学学报,1995,27:48-49.
  • 7杨德森.精神医学丛书(第1卷),精神医学基础[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1981.491.
  • 8张厚粲 王晓平.端文标准揄测验手册(中国城市修订版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985.1-60.
  • 9许淑莲 孙弘舸 等.成年人词语济性的年龄差异和词语记忆[J].心理学报,1989,21:337-345.
  • 10Das JR 杨艳云 等.认知过程的评估-智力的PASS理论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999.31-51.

共引文献180

同被引文献232

引证文献26

二级引证文献188

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部