期刊文献+

论控辩平等对抗 被引量:9

On Equal Adversary of both Parties to Litigations
原文传递
导出
摘要 控辩平等对抗是人权保障的要求 ,是诉讼现代化的要求。我国现行刑事诉讼法虽然吸收了当事人主义的合理因素 ,增强了诉讼的对抗性 ,但是并未真正实现控辩平等对抗。控辩平等对抗不仅存在于审判阶段 ,而且存在于审前阶段。由于双方的角色和任务不同 。 Equal adversary of both parties is the demand of the guarantee of human rights, and the requirement of proceedings modernization. The existing criminal procedure law of China has adopted some reasonable elements of adversary to increase the character of adversary of proceedings, but the equal adversary of both parties to litigations has not been realized. Equal adversary exists not only in trial, but also in pretrial stages. Different roles and tasks of both parties have decided that some inherent inequality exists between the prosecuting parties and defendants.
作者 李玉华
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期85-92,共8页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 平等对抗 价值 现状 实现 Equal Adversary Value Current Situation Realize
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1约翰·罗尔斯著 何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第3、7—8、56页.
  • 2Jerry L. Mashaw,Administrative Due Prooess the Quest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boron Universiry Law Reres, Vol.61,1981.
  • 3Jerry L. Mashaw,Due Prooess in the Administrative State,1985 by Yale University Press.
  • 4R. Saphire, Specifying Due Process Values:Towards a More Responsive Approach To Prccedural Protection,in University of Pesylvanis Law Review, Vol, 127,1978.
  • 5Stewart,The Reformation of American Administrative Law,88Harvard Law Review,1975.
  • 6Robert S. Summers,Evaluating and Improving Legal Process-A Plea for "Process Value", in Cornell Law Review,Vol. 61,1981., pp. 885 - 931.
  • 7Gerald J. Postema, the Principle of Utility and the Law of Procedure: Bentham's Theory of Adjudication, in Georgia Law Review, Vol. 11.1977.
  • 8E. Pincoffs, due Proeess, Fraternity, and a Kantian Injunction,in Due Process,Pennock and Chapman ( eds. ) ,pp.172-181.
  • 9E. Pincoffs,Due Process,Fraternity,and a Kantian Injunction,in due Process,Pennock and Chapman(eds.) ,pp. 172 -181.
  • 10Jerry L. Mashaw, Administrative Due Process: the Puest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boston University Law Review, Vol.61,1981.

共引文献207

同被引文献52

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部