勇敢扬弃《资本论》中为计划经济服务的理论——对何炼成教授的反批评,兼说《资本论》第三卷的理论失误

Discard the Theory for Planned Economy in On Capitals ——Anti-criticism against Pro. He Lianchen and Review of the Theoretical Errors of the Third Volume of On Capitals

《资本论》第三卷从作为使用价值唯一衡量尺度的"另一种意义"的社会必要劳动时间可以脱离市场而人工计算的思路中,设想消灭市场经济的计划经济模式,这种"劳动价值论一元论",是计划经济的理论基础。但从理论和实践两方面来看,其空想性很显然。后来,马克思本人在《哥达纲领批判》中实际上也已经否定了这种观点。在我国已坚定向社会主义市场经济转轨的大背景下,在党的十六大后,何炼成等学者继续张扬这种"劳动价值论一元论",是不妥的。

From the perspective of making manual counting of the social necessary work time, which is considered as 'the other meaning', the only standard of measurement of use value, with its separation from market, the third Volume of On Capitals figure out a planned economic mode to annihilate market economy. This 'single-element theory of work value' is the basis of the planned economy. However, from the aspects of theory and practice, its emptiness is very obvious. Later on, Marx himself also denied this viewpoint. In the large background of promoting socialist marketing economy and after the Sixteenth Congress Conference of our party, it is improper for scholars like He Liangcheng to carry out this 'single-element theory of work value'.