期刊文献+

重构我国民事诉讼证明标准 被引量:6

Rebuild Standard of Persuasion in Civil Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证明标准是证据法中重要而又难以把握的问题。认为我国民事案件应该采用法律真实的证明标准而不是客观真实的证明标准。而法律真实证明标准又可分为优势证据证明标准和高度盖然性证明标准。根据人们认识事物常态和现阶段的法律状况等因素,认为我国民事案件应该采用高度盖然性证明标准,在采用高度盖然性证明标准过程中有些事项需要予以注意。 Standard of proof is an important issue in evidence law; however, it is difficult to grasp accurately. The author thinks we should adopt legal truth but objective truth in selecting standard of persuasion in civil action. Standard of providing legal truth can be classified into witness standard of preponderance of probability and the high degree of probability. The author considers witness standard of the high degree of probability should be adopted in our civil cases according to the usual way of knowing things, the present state of law and other factors. We should pay attention to something in course of applying witness standard of the high degree of probability.
作者 汪颜芬
机构地区 集美大学社科系
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2004年第1期29-33,共5页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 证明标准 客观真实 法律真实 优势证据证明标准 高度盖然性证明标准 standard of proof objective truth legal truth preponderance of probability high degree of probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1毕玉谦.举证责任分配体系之构建[J].法学研究,1999,21(2):46-59. 被引量:101
  • 2王亚新.刑事诉讼中发现案件真相与抑制主观随意性的问题——关于自由心证原则历史和现状的比较法研究[J].比较法研究,1993,7(2):113-144. 被引量:122
  • 3Steve L. Emanudl ,Howard M. Rossen,Wilton S. Sogg, Civil Procedure,West Piblishing Co. 1977 ,p. 184.
  • 4Peter Murphy,A Practical Approach to Evidence,p. 105.
  • 5Peter Gillies, Law of Evodence in Australia, pp. 66 - 67.
  • 6[美]Edmund M.Morgan著.《证据法之基本问题》.李学灯译.台湾世界书局(发行),1982年版,第48页,第49页.
  • 7William Twining, Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore, Standford University Press, 1985. p. 53.
  • 8John J. Cound, Jack H. Friendenthal,Arther R. Miller, John E. Sexton:Civil Procedure Cases and Materials, West Publishing Co. 1989, p. 934.
  • 9Mauro Cappelletti,Joseph M. Perillo,Civil Procedure in Italy, p. 189.
  • 10Peter E. Herzog, Martha Weser, Civil Procedure in France, Martinus Nijholf, The Hague, Netherlands 1967, p. 310.

共引文献54

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部