期刊文献+

论弗洛伊德精神分析学说的三种解释方式 被引量:3

THREE KINDS OF EXPLANATION TO FREUD'S THEORIES OF MENTAL ANALYSIS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 弗洛伊德的精神分析学说是当代西方理论界争议较大的学说之一。争议的主要分歧在于精神分析学说的臆测性和科学性。作者认为精神分析学说的科学性和弗洛伊德积累材料、解释材料的方式有关,深入分析弗洛伊德积累材料、解释材料的方式有助于科学地评价精神分析学说。因此,本文试图论述弗洛伊德解释癔病、梦与日常生活失误行为、文学艺术的三种不同方式,从而对精神分析学说这三个领域的内容的科学性做出评价。 Freud's theory of mental analysis is among the most controversial theories in modern Western theoretical domain. The dispute of the controversy mainly lies in whether it is speculative or scientific. The writer thinks that its scientific feature has something to do with the ways in which Freud accumulated and explained materials, and thus, further analysis of his ways of doing these may be conducive to its scientific evaluation. In this paper, the writer tries to discuss Freud's three different ways of explaining hysteria, dreams and errors in daily life and literature and arts so as to scientifically evaluate the scientific features in these three fields of the theory of mental analysis.
作者 李亚旭
出处 《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2004年第2期18-21,共4页 Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
关键词 弗洛伊德 精神分析学说 无意识理论 梦意识 心理学 Freud outcomes of experiments phenomena and significance explanation and utilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]弗洛伊德.弗洛伊德自传[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
  • 2[4]普通逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1979.
  • 3弗洛伊德 高觉敷(译).精神分析引论[M].北京:商务书馆,1984.360-361.
  • 4[9]弗洛伊德.梦的解析[M].北京:作家出版社,1986.
  • 5[7](苏)M·M巴赫金,B·H沃洛申夫,等.弗洛伊德评述[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987.
  • 6埃里希·弗洛姆.弗洛伊德思想的贡献与局限[M].申荷永,译.长沙:湖南人民出版社,1986.
  • 7[10]弗洛伊德.弗洛伊德论美文选[M].北京:知识出版社,1987.

共引文献54

同被引文献18

  • 1刘志成.弗洛伊德精神分析法解析电影《廊桥遗梦》[J].电影文学,2013(5):73-74. 被引量:1
  • 2张慧瑜.娄烨的影像“谜事”[J].南风窗,2012(24):92-94. 被引量:5
  • 3Chen, Chien-Cheng and A Su-Fen Chiu ( 2008 ) "An Integrative Model Linking Supervisor Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior", Journal of Business Psychology 23: 1-10.
  • 4Daniels, Major Chip ( 2005 ) "Making Values-Based, Mission-Focused Decisions, " Leader to Leader, Fall Supplement 1, Vol. 2005 : 48-59.
  • 5Farley, Lisa ( 2007 ), "The "Shadowy Underside" of Learning History", The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 29: 423-440.
  • 6Muris, Peter ( 2006 ) "Freud was Right... About the Origins of Abnormal Behavior", Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, February 2006: 1-12.
  • 7冷铁勋.对公众与公共决策的认识误区及矫正对策[M]//“阳光政府与公民社会建设”一国两制文库.澳门:理工学院一国两制研究中心出版,2010.
  • 8Heywood, Andrew. Politics[M].张立鹏,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 9[美]弗洛伊德.弗洛伊德心理哲学[M].杨韶刚,等.译,九州岛:日本九州岛出版社,2006.
  • 10孙贵林,段黎明.新弗洛伊德学派对弗洛伊德人格理论的改造[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2):37-39. 被引量:2

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部