期刊文献+

输出方式和输出时间对数字广度的影响 被引量:1

INFLUENCE OF OUTPUT MODE AND OUTPUT TIME FOR DIGIT SPAN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实验目的是探讨在不同的输出方式下 ,输出时间对短时记忆的影响是否相同。在数字广度实验中 ,给被试呈现单个数字组成的数字串 ,要求被试分别采用口头和书写两种输出方式来报告不同的内容 :直接报告刺激呈现的单个数字串 ,以及在每个数字前附加不同长度的字符报告。结果发现附加字符使口头和书写的输出时间都增加。但在口头报告中 ,输出时间增加的同时伴随着记忆成绩下降 ,而书写报告的记忆成绩不受影响。讨论了此结果的意义 ,推测输出阶段中影响记忆成绩的可能是发音时间 ,而不是延迟时间。 The purpose of this experiment was to discuss the influence of output time for performance of short-term memory (STM) in oral and writing output modes. The task was a digit span test. When presenting singular sequences, subjects were required to report two kinds of sequences in oral and writing modes, one was the original singular sequences, the other was the sequences with additional characters of different length prior to each digit. Given stimuli of the same length, we found that the output time was longer when adding some characters in both oral and writing output modes. The performance declined with the increase of the output time in oral report, but not in writing. This result inferred that the total output time was not a good predictor of span in STM. On the other hand, it also suggested that the influential factormay not be delay time, but articulatory time.
作者 宣宾 张达人
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期315-321,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 ( 3 0 3 79478)
关键词 输出时间 数字广度 发音时间 延迟时间 output time, digit span,articulatory time, delay time.
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Wang S, Wang A S. Cognitive Psychology. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1992. 137-169(王甦,汪安圣.认知心理学.北京:北京大学出版社,1992.137-169)
  • 2Schweickert R, Boruff B. Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory & Cognition, 1986, 12:419~425
  • 3Tehan G, Lalor D M. Individual differences in memory span:The contribution of rehearsal, access to lexical memory, and output speed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000,53A(4): 1012~1038
  • 4Lovatt P, Avons S E, Masterson J. The word-length effect and disyllabic words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000, 53A(1): 1~22
  • 5Baddeley A D. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1986. 75~107
  • 6Neath I, Nairne J S. Word-length effect in immediate memory:Overwriting trace decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1995, 2:429~441
  • 7Service E. The Effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, Not articulatory duration.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1998, 51A(2): 283~304
  • 8Zhu Y. Experimental Psychology. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2000. 315-396(朱滢.实验心理学.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.315-396)
  • 9Peng D L. General Psychology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2001. 213-219(彭聃龄.普通心理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.213-219)
  • 10Baddeley A D, Thomson N, Buchanan M. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14:575~589

二级参考文献13

  • 1崔耀,心理学报,1996年,28卷,238页
  • 2朱滢,心理学报,1991年,23卷,264页
  • 3喻柏林,心理学报,1986年,18卷,140页
  • 4张武田,心理学报,1986年,18卷,133页
  • 5张达人,心理学报,1997年,39卷,234页
  • 6张达人,心理学报,1997年,29卷,234页
  • 7崔耀,心理学报,1996年,28卷,238页
  • 8龚耀先,修订韦氏成人智力量表手册,1982年
  • 9Knoedler A.J., Hellwig K. A. & Neath I. The Shift From Recency to Primacy WithIncreasing Delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition,1999.25(2):474-487
  • 10DeZazzo J. & Tully T. Dissection of Memroy Formation:From BehavioralPharmacology to Molecular Genetics.TINS, 1995.18(5) :212 - 217

共引文献11

同被引文献33

  • 1丁锦红,王丽燕.语音回路与阅读理解关系的眼动研究[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):694-701. 被引量:12
  • 2何先友,毛斌红,曾祥炎.汉语中词长效应的初步实验研究[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):32-35. 被引量:5
  • 3Baddeley A D. Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 2002, 7(2): 85-97.
  • 4Repova G, Baddeley A D. The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cog- nitive psychology. Neuroscience, 2006, 139:5-21.
  • 5Baddeley A D, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 1998, 105(1): 158-173.
  • 6Alloway T P, Gathercole S E, Wills C, et al. A structural analysis of working memory and related cog- nitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2004, 87:85-106.
  • 7Cowan N, Day L, Saults J S, et al. The role of verbal output time in effects of word length on immediate memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 1992, 31: 1-17.
  • 8Cowan N, Wood N L, Wood P K, et al. Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology :General, 1998, 127(2): 141-160.
  • 9Baddeley A D, Chincotta D, Stafford L, et al. Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2002, 55A(2) : 353-369.
  • 10Caplan D, Rochon E, Waters G S. Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects of word length effects in span tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psy- chology, 1992, 45(A): 177-192.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部