期刊文献+

“客观实在”“实体唯物论”“唯能论”与唯物论的非实体化——论列宁的“客观实在”物质观的科学价值 被引量:2

Objective Reality","Substantiality Materialism","Energy Doctrine"and Non-hypostatization of Materialism——On Lenin′s Science Value of Material Concept of"Objective Reality
下载PDF
导出
摘要  列宁用"客观实在"所阐释的辩证唯物主义的物质观,不仅克服了以实体范畴所阐释的机械唯物主义物质观的历史局限,而且也能很好包容和解释当时自然科学所取得的相关成果,并且还能很好包容和解释之后涌现出的一系列崭新的现代科学成果;"客观实在"所具有的一般性、普遍性、全面性和抽象性特征,使它拥有了极为深刻的内涵和极为广泛的外延,用它所规定的哲学物质范畴不仅具有合理性,而且具有现实而深远的科学意义和价值;"唯能论"并不等于唯心论,列宁在批判唯心主义的"唯能论"的同时,又对"唯能论"做出了唯物主义的解释。正是列宁提出的"客观实在"物质观为辩证唯物论的非实体化发展开辟了一条新路径。 The material concept of dialectical materialism expounded by Lenin by use of 'objective reality' not only overcomes the historic localization of the material concept of mechanical materialism explained by the substantiality domain, but also involves and interpret in a good way the related results of natural sciences at that time and a series of brand-new achievements of modern sciences emerging after the involvement and interpretation. The specific features of the commonality, generality, comprehensiveness and abstractness possessed by 'objective reality' enable it to get extremely profound connotations and emmensely wide external extension. The philosophic material domain defined by 'objective reality' has not only the reasonability, but also the real and far-reaching scientific significance and value. The 'energetic doctrine' does not equal immaterialism. While criticizing the 'energetic doctrine' of immaterialism, Lenin made a materialist explanation on the 'energetic doctrine'. It is the material concept of 'objective reality' Lenin put forward by Lenin that has opened a new way for the development of non-hypostatization of dialectical materialism.
作者 邬焜
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第2期69-75,共7页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
关键词 列宁 客观实在 实体 唯物主义 物质观 唯能论 非实体化 objective reality substantiality materialism material concept energetic doctrine non-hypostatization
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[美]A·爱因斯坦(A·Einstein),[美]L·英费尔德(L·Infeld) 著,周肇威.物理学的进化[M]上海科学技术出版社,1962.
  • 2(古希腊)亚里士多德(Aristotle)著,吴寿彭.形而上学[M]商务印书馆,1959.

同被引文献21

  • 1韩振峰.一元论、二元论、多元论[J].天津师大学报,1986,6(5):17-18. 被引量:2
  • 2WU KUN. The Basic Theory of Philosophy of Information[M]. Paper, 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, August, Beijing, 2010:12-13,115-117.
  • 3BRENNER J E. The Logic of Ethical Information[J]. In: H. Demir(ed.), Knowledge, Technology, Policy, 2010, 23(1-2): 109-133.
  • 4FRENCH S. The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence[J]. Synthese, 2010, 175: 89-109.
  • 5MARES E. The nature of information: a relevant approach[J], Synthese, 2010 ( 175 ) : 111-132.
  • 6BRENNER J E. The Philosophical Logic of Stephane Lupasco[J]. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2010, 19: 243-285.
  • 7SEIBT J.Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory[J]. Synthese, 2009 ( 166 ) :479-512.
  • 8BRENNER J E.Process in Reality: A Logical Offering[J]. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2005 ( 14 ) : 165-202.
  • 9LUHN G. Towards an Ontology of Information and succeeding Fundamentals in Computing Science[J]. Paper, 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, August, 2010, Beijing.
  • 10LADYMAN J, ROSS D. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部