期刊文献+

反身性与“曼海姆悖论”——兼论相对主义社会学的可能性 被引量:21

Reflexivity and Mannheim Paradox: An approach to sociology of relativism
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper focuses on the relation between reflexivity and sociology of knowledge. The term “reflexivity” has two essential references: self reflection and self refutation. Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge is based on historicism which is relativistic, so the theory of sociology of knowledge is self-refutatory. Mannheim tried to use self reflection as instrument to destruct Mannheim Paradox but be failed. Sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) attempts to dissolve the paradox by asserting its relativism, but the paradox remains. In the auther’s opinion, the paradox can’t be dissolved and so Mannheim and SSK’s ambition of constructing epistemology of relativism for sociology is impossible in the context of rationalism. This paper focuses on the relation between reflexivity and sociology of knowledge. The term “reflexivity” has two essential references: self reflection and self refutation. Mannheim's sociology of knowledge is based on historicism which is relativistic, so the theory of sociology of knowledge is self-refutatory. Mannheim tried to use self reflection as instrument to destruct Mannheim Paradox but be failed. Sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) attempts to dissolve the paradox by asserting its relativism, but the paradox remains. In the auther's opinion, the paradox can't be dissolved and so Mannheim and SSK's ambition of constructing epistemology of relativism for sociology is impossible in the context of rationalism.
作者 肖瑛
机构地区 湘潭大学
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期47-57,共11页 Sociological Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1Lynch, M. ," Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged knowledge", in Theory, Culture, & Society,2OOO,Vol. 17(3),26-54.
  • 2Suber, P., "A Bibliography of Works on Reflexivity. " In Self- Reference:Reflections on Reflexivity, ed. by Steven & Suber, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987,259.
  • 3陈波.《逻辑哲学导论》.中国人民大学出版社2002年版,第237~242,237,253,242-252页.
  • 4Priest, G., "Unstable Solutions to the Liar Paradox. " In Self-Reference: Reflections on/L-y'/exiv/ty, 145 - 175.
  • 5Suber, P. A Bibliography of works on Reflexivity.
  • 6Lash,S.,Sociology of Postmodernism London:Routledge.1990.
  • 7林格.《编者导言》.《哲学解释学》,夏镇平,等译.上海译文出版社1994年版.
  • 8Ashmore, M., The Reflexive Tilests : Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Know/edge, London: The Umversity of Chicago Press ,61.1989.
  • 9伽达默尔 洪汉鼎译.《真理与方法》[M].台湾时报出版社,1992年版.第574页.
  • 10林格.《编者导言》[A].夏镇平等译.《哲学解释学》[C].上海译文出版社,1994..

共引文献49

同被引文献678

引证文献21

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部