期刊文献+

水权交易比率制度的设计与模拟 被引量:12

A Trading-ratio System for Water Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 在传统水权交易制度下 ,不同用户之间的水权交易可能会减少交易双方之间河段、以及后续河段的留川水量。由于此第三者负效应的存在 ,水权交易一直难于应用与实施。本文设计了一套简单易行的水权交易比率制度。首先 ,政府规定各河段的最小留川水量需求 ;接着 ,根据留川水量需求决定各河段水权的初始分配 ,并根据交易双方用水的回流系数规定各用水者之间的交易比率。 Traditional water right trading between different users may bring third-party effects as reducing the instream flow of the intermediate stream and downstream. A set of simple trading rules of water market is designed to avoid third-party effects. The initial water right is distributed to meet the minimum instream flow standard which the authority sets exogenously, and the trading ratios are set by the authority too. The trading ratios are set exogenously based on return flow parameters to ensure that any trading would not violate minimum instream flow standards and consequently to reduce the transation costs. This paper shows that the trading rules can take care of the location effects of users and can achieve social optimal when only local return flows occurs. While in the case of cross-zonal return flows, the trading may not bring the optimal outcome which dues to the minimum instream flow standard which is used to avoid third-party effects.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第6期69-77,共9页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 水权交易比率制度 最小留川水量 水资源开发 第三者负效应 交易成本 水权市场 water right, trading ratio, return flows, minimum instream flow, third-party effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Anderson, Terry L, Johnson, Ronald N.1986,The Problem of Instream Flows. Economic Inquiry. Huntington Beach: Vol. 24, Iss. 4.
  • 2Burness, H Stuart,James P Quirk, 1979, Appropfiative Water Rights and the Effcient Allocation of Resources. The American Economic Review. Nashville: March .Vol. 69, Iss. 1; p. 25.
  • 3Frank A Ward. James F Booker. 2003, Economic costs and benefits of instream flow protection for endangered specie in an international basin.Journal of the American Water Resources Association ; Apr 39, 2 ; ProQuest Science Journals pg. 427.
  • 4Griffin, Ronald C Shih-Hsun Hsu. 1993, The potential for water market efficiency when instream flows have value. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Malden: Vol. 75, Iss. 2; p. 292.
  • 5Gareth P Green, John P O'Connor. 2001, Water banking and restoration of endangered species habitat: an application to the snake river.Contemporary Economic Policy. Huntington Beach: Apt 2001. Vol. 19, Iss. 2; p. 225.
  • 6James J Murphy, Ariel Dinar, Richard E Howitt, Steven J Rassenti, Vernon L Smith.2000, The Design of "Smart" Water Market Institutions Using Laboratory Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics. Dordrecht: Vol. 17, Iss. 4; p. 375.
  • 7Livingston, Marie Leigh, Miller, Thomas A 1986, A Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Western Instream Water Rights on Choice Domains: Transferability, Externalities, and Consumptive Use. Land Economics. Madison: Vol. 62, Iss. 3; p. 269.
  • 8Robert R Hearne, K William Easter. 1997, The economic and financial gains from water markets in Chile. Agricultural Economics 15.
  • 9Rosegrant, M W C Ringler, D C MeKinney, X Cai, A Keller, and G Donoso.2000, Integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the maipo river basin. Agricultural Economics 24, 33-46.
  • 10Weber, Marian L. 2001, Markets for Water Rights under Environmental Constraints. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42.

同被引文献306

引证文献12

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部