期刊文献+

一种改进的行和归一化排序方法 被引量:8

Improved normalizing rank aggregation method for priorities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了一种改进的行和归一化排序方法 (INRAM) ,从保序性、置换不变性、相容性和累积优势度等方面对该方法的合理性进行了研究 ,并且利用互补判断矩阵和互反判断矩阵之间的转换公式 ,给出了相应的求解互补判断矩阵排序向量的算法 ,从而丰富和发展了互反和互补判断矩阵的排序理论 .最后 ,通过算例将NRAM法和INRAM法与特征根排序方法 (EM)及对数最小二乘法 (LLSM)作了对比分析 .数值结果表明 :INRAM法不仅简洁易行 ,而且与EM法的排序结果完全一致 。 An improved normalizing rank aggregation method (INRAM) for priorities of reciprocal judgment matrices is presented and some of its desirable properties such as rank preservation, compatibility and cumulative dominance are studied. By using the transformation formulas of reciprocal judgment matrix and complementary judgment matrix, the corresponding method for priorities of complementary judgment matrix is given. The priority theory of reciprocal judgment matrices and complementary judgment matrices is thus developed. The normalizing rank aggregation method (NRAM) and the INRAM are compared with the eigenvector priority method and the logarithmic least squares method through some numerical examples. The numerical results show that the INRAM is simple, feasible and can get the same priorities as that with the eigenvector priority method.
出处 《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期518-522,共5页 Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 ( 79970 0 94) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目 ( 2 0 0 3 0 3 43 66) .
关键词 层次分析法 行和9-5-化排序方法 排序 Agglomeration Decision making Matrix algebra Modification Queueing theory Vectors
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Saaty T L,Vargas L G.The logic of priorities [M].Dordrecht:Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing,1982.10-50.
  • 2Saaty T L.Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares [J].European Journal of Operational Research,1990,48(1):156-160.
  • 3Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process [M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980.1-45.
  • 4Orlovsky S A.Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1(3):155-167.
  • 5Nurmi H.Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1981,6(3):249-259.
  • 6Tanino T.Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1984,12(2):117-131.
  • 7Chiclana F,Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,97(1):33-48.
  • 8Lipovetsky S,Michael Conklin M.Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP [J].European Journal of Operational Research,2002,137(1):110-122.
  • 9Xu Z S,Da Q L.The uncertain OWA operator [J].International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2002,17(6):569-575.
  • 10Xu Z S,Da Q L.An approach to improving consistency of fuzzy preference matrix [J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2003,2(1):3-12.

二级参考文献24

  • 1汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1993,13(5):24-26. 被引量:128
  • 2左军.层次分析中判断矩阵的间接给出去[J].系统工程,1989,9(6):56-63.
  • 3陈宝谦,南开大学学报,1989年,1期,38页
  • 4许树柏,层次分析法原理,1988年
  • 5杜栋.AHP判断矩阵一致性问题的数学变换解决方法.决策科学及其应用[M].北京:海洋出版社,1996..
  • 6徐泽水.Fuzzy环境中群组决策新方法[J].曲阜师范大学学报,1997,:1-2.
  • 7徐泽水,曲阜师范大学学报,1997年,增刊
  • 8张崎,系统工程理论与实践,1997年,17卷,1期,29页
  • 9杜栋,决策科学及其应用,1996年
  • 10汪浩,系统工程理论与实践,1993年,13卷,9期,24页

共引文献737

同被引文献60

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部