摘要
对于中外合作经营企业外方先行回收投资的法律性质,现行的各种学说均不能作出准确的界定。其中的“优先补偿说”、“让利说”和“保本经营说”实际上只是分析了该制度的经济性质;而“股权(资本)转让说”和“减资说”对该制度的法律定性,则都存在着以偏概全,难以自圆其说的缺陷。似惟有本文提出的“特殊信贷说”,可比较适当地说明中外合作经营企业外方先行回收投资法律制度的基本特征。
The right opinions can not be found on the Legal Nature of the foreign party's Recovering its Investment in Chinese-Foreign Contractual Joint Ventures ahead of Time by now. The advocated doctrines of “preferred recovery”,“favorable treatment”, and “non-loss operating”may only be used to explain the economic aspects of the regime. Although the other two promoted doctrines——the doctrines of “share (investment)-transfer”and “capital-deducting”refer to the legal nature of the regime, they share the same logical problems. It seems that the “special loan”doctrine forwarded by this article will tell the actual characteristic of the regime.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期76-80,共5页
Modern Law Science