主体间性是后实践美学的陷阱——与杨春时教授商榷

On Inter-subjectivity as a Trap for Post-praxis Aesthetics:A discussion with Mr.Yang Cun-shi

杨春时的《现代性视野中的文学与美学》的一些观点值得商榷。首先 ,杨春时把主体间性当作对主体性的超越 ,不顾历史事实笼统地把马克思主义实践美学硬性指派为“主体性”美学。其次 ,杨春时为了突出主体间性的“统一”神威而任意歪曲和贬斥实践的统一主体与客体的实际伟大力量。最后 ,杨春时无限夸大了主体间性转向和主体间性的法力 ,从而作出了一些悖谬的结论。由此看来 ,后实践美学这条船最终恐怕会在与后现代主义的主体间性接轨的过程中陷死在主体间性的轨道陷阱之中。

In this paper the author gives his discussion to Mr.Yang Cun shi's paper Literature and Aesthetics under the Perspective of Modernity .First,he argues that in Yang's paper inter subjectivity is deemed as a surpass to subjectivity,and without thinking,Marxist praxis aesthetics is classified into “subjective aesthetics”.Secondly,he points out,in order to give prominence to the unifying power of inter subjectivity,Mr.Yang arbitrarily distorted and underestimated real power of praxis in unifying the subject and object.Thirdly,several absurd conclusions in Yang's paper are exposed which are due to Yang's overestimation of inter subjectivity turn and its magic power.Base on above argument,the author suggests that post praxis aesthetics will be brought to a trap when following the track of post modernist inter subjectivity.