期刊文献+

白色瘤胃球菌对秸秆细胞壁和微晶纤维素的附着比较 被引量:5

Comparison of Adhesion Ability of Ruminococcus albus-7 to Corn Stalks Cell Wall and Crystalline Cellulose
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用比浊法测定了白色瘤胃球菌 (R .albus 7)对球磨、未球磨玉米秸秆细胞壁和微晶纤维素的附着率。结果表明 ,白色瘤胃球菌对球磨玉米秸细胞壁的附着能力与微晶纤维素相当 ,且二者显著高于未球磨玉米秸细胞壁的附着率 (P <0 .0 1) ,说明增加细胞壁颗粒表面积可以提高纤维分解菌的附着程度。白色瘤胃球菌经酶 (胰蛋白酶、蛋白酶 )和高碘酸钠修饰后 ,可显著降低其对玉米秸细胞壁和微晶纤维素的附着能力 (P <0 .0 1) ,而用甲醛或戊二醛固定细菌蛋白质对细菌的附着能力没有显著影响 ,推测细胞表面的蛋白质和碳水化合物同时参与了对植物细胞壁的附着。细菌经氯化锂修饰后附着能力下降最为明显 ,说明S层蛋白质 (单一蛋白质或糖蛋白 ) Adhesion ability of the cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus albus-7 to either ball milled corn stalks cell wall or not or crystalline cellulose was compared by incubating bacterial suspensions with these three substrates for 60 min at 39℃, allowing the substrates to precipitate for 60 min, centrifuging the mixtures at 1200 rpm for 5 min, and measuring the optical densities of the supernatants. There was no significant difference between the adhesion of R. albus-7 to ball milled corn stalks cell wall and to crystalline cellulose, but both of them were significantly higher than the grounded corn stalks cell wall (P<0.01). This result indicated that the increase of surface areas of substrates could enhance the extent of adhesion to substrates. The adhesion ability of R. albus-7 to ball milled corn stalks cell wall or crystalline cellulose was significantly decreased by the modifications with enzymes (trypsin or protease) or periodate (P<0.01), but the modifications with formalin and glutaraldehyde on adhesion of R. albus-7 to both of the substrates had no statistical difference compared with the control (P>0.05), which postulated that both the protein and carbohydrate existing on the bacterial cell surface involved the mechanism of adhesion. The adhesion ability of R. albus-7 was greatly decreased by the modification with LiCl, and this result strongly suggests that the S-layer protein may take an important role in the ad-(hesion) process of R. albus-7.
作者 高巍 孟庆翔
出处 《中国畜牧杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2004年第6期17-19,共3页 Chinese Journal of Animal Science
基金 国家杰出青年基金项目 ( 3 0 12 5 0 3 3 ) 国家自然科学基金项目 ( 3 0 2 70 944 )资助
关键词 畜牧学 植物细胞壁附着 白色瘤胃球茵 纤维素 瘤胃 Animal science Plant cell wall adhesion Ruminococcus albus Cellulose Rumen
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Craig W M, Broderick G A, Ricker D B. Quantitation microorganisms associated with the particulate phase of ruminal ingesta[J]. J Nutr, 1987, 117: 56-64.
  • 2Williams A G, Strachan N H. Polysaccharide degrading enzymes in microbial populations from the liquid and solid fractions of bovine rumen digesta[J]. Can J Anim Sci, 1984, 64: 58-59.
  • 3Gong J, Forsberg C W. Factors affecting adhesion Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and adherence defective mutant to cellul-ose[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1989, 55: 3039-3044.
  • 4Morris E J, Cole O J. Relationship between cellulolytic act-ivity and adhesion to cellulose in Ruminococcus albus[J]. J Gen Microbiol, 1987, 133: 1023-1032.
  • 5Hungate R E. A roll-tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes[J]. Methods Microbiol, 1969, 3B: 117-132.
  • 6Bhat S, Wallace R J, Orskov E R. Adhesion of cellulolytic ruminal bacteria to barley straw [J]. Appl Environ Micro-biol, 1990, 56: 2698-2703.
  • 7SAS Institute. User's guide: statistics version 6 editions[M]. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, N C, 1996.
  • 8Pell A N, Schofield. Microbial adhesion and degradation of plant cell walls[A]. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility[M]. Hatfield R D, Jung H G, Ralph J, et al. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI. 1993. 197-423.
  • 9Lortal S, Heijenoort J V, Gruber K, et al. S-layer of Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 12046: isolation, chemical characterization and re-formation after extraction with lithium chloride[J]. J Gen Microbiol, 1992, 138: 611-618.
  • 10高巍,孟庆翔.瘤胃细菌、原虫和真菌降解植物细胞壁的相对贡献及其互作[J].中国农业大学学报,2003,8(5):98-104. 被引量:26

二级参考文献34

  • 1Bauehop T. The anaerobic fungi in rumen fibre digestion[J]. Agrie Environ, 1981, 6:339- 348.
  • 2Clarke R T J. Protozoa in the rumen ecosystem [A]. In:Clarke R T J, Bauchop T, eds. Microbial Ecology of the Gut[C]. New York: Academic Press, Inc, 1977. 251 -275.
  • 3Hungate R E. The Rumen and Its Microbes [ M ]. NewYork: Academic Press, Inc, 1966. 92- 146.
  • 4Stewart C S. Hant- animal and microbial interactions in ruminant fibre degradation [A]. In: Prins R A, Stewart C S, eds. Microorganisms in Ruminant Nutrition [ C ]. The Netherlands: Nottingham University Press, 1993. 13 - 28.
  • 5Cheng K J, Forsberg C W, Minato H, et al. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen[A]. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R, eds. Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants[C]. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Academic Press, 1991,595 - 624.
  • 6Windham W R, Akin D E. Rumen fungi and forage fiber degradation[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1984, 48:473 -476.
  • 7Dijkstra J, Tamminga S. Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen [J]. Brit J Nutr, 1995, 74:617-634.
  • 8Coleman G S. The eellulase content of 15 species of entodiniomorphid protozoa, mixed bacteria and plant debris isolated from the oxine rumen [J]. J Agrie Sci Camb, 1985, 104:349 - 360.
  • 9Coleman G S. The distribution of carboxymethylcellulase between fractions from the rumen of sheep containing no protozoa or one of five different protozoal populations [J]. J Agric Sci Camb, 1986, 106:121 - 127.
  • 10Orpin C G. Studies on the rmnen flagellate Neocallimastix fiontalis[J]. J Gen Microbiol, 1975, 91:249-262.

共引文献31

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部