期刊文献+

对掠夺性定价的再认识 被引量:3

Reconsideration of the Predatory Pricing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对掠夺性定价判断标准及其与垄断的关系的探讨 ,提出了对掠夺性定价的一些看法。认为掠夺性定价并不如定义那般完美 ,无论从理论上还是在现实中 ,厂商要借这一价格策略来达到目的都很困难 ,而且对于处于新经济时代的数字产品的价格策略来说 。 On base of discussing some problems about predatory pricing in fields of judging standards,relationships with monopoly and the speed of antitrust,combing previous research achievements and practice,the author put forward some viewpoints about predatory pricing, and consider that predatory pricing is not the same as teaching materials described, it's difficult that a company achieves its own goals by means of predatory pricing both in theory and in practice, especially for some pricing strategies of digital products in era of new economy, which traditional definition of predatory pricing seems not give us a perfect explanation.
作者 尹莉
出处 《产业经济研究》 2004年第4期46-51,70,共7页 Industrial Economics Research
关键词 掠夺性定价 标准 垄断 数字产业 predatory pricing standard monopoly digital product
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献18

  • 1Section 2 of the Sherman Act,Article 86 of the Treaty of Rome,Japan's Antimonopoly Act.
  • 2Steven J. Davis and Kevin M. Murphy, 2000:A Competitive Perspective on Internet Explorer,AEA Papers and Proceedings,May 2000.
  • 3Franklin M. Fisher, 2000: The IBM and Microsoft Cases:What's the Difference? AEA Papers and Proceedings, May 2000,Vol. 90, No. 2.
  • 4Richard Schmalensee, 2000:The IBM and Microsoft Cases:What's the Difference? AEA Papers and Proceedings,May 2000,Vol. 90,No. 2.
  • 5Richard B. Mckenzie and Dwight R. Lee,Summer 2001,How Digital Economics Revises Antitrust Thinking? The Antitrust Bulletin.
  • 6于立.1994:《当代西方产业组织学》.大连.东北财经大学出版社,1994.
  • 7卡布尔主编.2000:《产业经济学前沿问题》.中文版.北京.中幽税务出版社,2000.
  • 8卡尔·夏皮罗,等.2000:《信息规则-网络经济的策略指导》.北京,中国人民大学出版社,2000.
  • 9丹尼尔·史普博.管制与市场(中译本)[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1999.
  • 10丹尼斯·卡尔顿、杰弗里·佩罗夫.现代产业组织(中译本)[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1998.

共引文献92

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部