期刊文献+

基于M型组织结构的企业内部激励机制与兼并效应 被引量:2

Merger Effects and the Managerial Incentive Schemes of Firms with Multidivisional Form of Internal Organization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在寡头竞争环境下,引入企业内部激励机制激励参数变量,建立了一个替代性产品M型制下企业兼并二阶段Cournot竞争博弈模型:第一阶段,兼并企业采用M型制并选择基于利润和销售收入内部激励机制的激励参数;在第二阶段,兼并后各企业的决策者根据企业提供的内部激励机制进行产量竞争。在此基础上,分析了兼并对各企业利润、产量与价格带来的影响。证明对于替代性产品行业,存在一个兼并临界规模(1)只有当兼并规模小于临界规模时,兼并企业才适合采用M型组织结构;且企业普遍存在兼并动机,产品替代化程度越高,兼并动力越大;(2)当兼并企业采用M型组织结构且兼并规模小于临界规模时,兼并对外部企业产生负外部性,但对消费者带来有利影响。本文还进一步讨论了兼并企业采用M型组织结构时内部激励机制激励参数的选择问题,证明激励参数受行业利润率、兼并规模与产品替代性程度的影响。 In this paper,we analyze merger incentives and merger effects caused by the managerial incentives based on divisional profits and revenues,and establishes a two stage game model of endogenous mergers under Cournot compettion in an oligopoly industry with substitute products.In the first stage,the owners of the firms select the managers' incentive schemes,and in the second stage,the divisional managers choose quantities or prices.It is showed that existing a critical size,and when mergers with M-form under the critical size:(1)mergers are profitable to the players,(2)mergers are not profitable to other firms out of mergers alliance,but have a converse effect on the customers.We also studies how owner of mergers firm select the optimal managers' incentive,it is showed that the parameter of the optimal incentive be determined by profit ratio,product substitution coefficient and size of mergers.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 2004年第3期26-32,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70171025) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(02JJY5017)
关键词 兼并 M型企业 激励机制 兼并效应 COURNOT竞争 merger multidivisonal form firm incentive schemes merger effects Cournot competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Stigler G J. Monopoly and oligopoly by merger [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1950,40(2) :23 ~ 34.
  • 2Salant S W, Switzer S, Reynolds R J. Losses from horizontal mergers:The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on CournotNash equilibrium [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983,98: 185~199.
  • 3方芳,闫晓彤.中国上市公司并购绩效与思考[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002,22(8):43-48. 被引量:92
  • 4Perry M K, Porter R H. Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger[ J]. The American Economic Review, 1985,75: 219 ~ 227.
  • 5Deneckere R, Davidson C. Incentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competition[ J ]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1986,16:473 ~ 486.
  • 6Beggs A W. Mergers and malls[ J ]. Joumal of Industrial Economics,1994,42:419 - 428.
  • 7方晓东,张地生,唐元虎.企业兼并的产品协同效应[J].预测,2002,21(5):66-69. 被引量:6
  • 8夏同水,徐伟宣.兼并效应与产品覆盖策略[J].管理科学学报,2002,5(3):50-55. 被引量:14
  • 9化冰,陈宏民.基于生产能力约束的差异产品企业兼并模型[J].系统工程,2001,19(6):51-54. 被引量:12
  • 10Mason R. Network Externalities and the cause conjecture[J]. European Economic Review,2000,44(2): 1981 ~ 1992.

二级参考文献7

共引文献113

同被引文献64

  • 1钟德强,仲伟俊,罗定提,张晓琪.企业内部激励机制与兼并效应[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(4):378-386. 被引量:6
  • 2陈宏民.企业间的横向合并与国际贸易[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1994,3(3):25-32. 被引量:23
  • 3钟德强,仲伟俊.Bertrand竞争下异质产品企业委托授权与横向兼并效应分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(10):1-10. 被引量:4
  • 4Gowrisankaran G. A dynamic model of endogenous horizontal mergers[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1999,30(1): 56-83.
  • 5Dockner E J, A Gaunersdorfer. On the profitability of horizontal mergers in industries with dynamic competition [J]. Japan and the World Economy, 2001, 13: 195-216.
  • 6Ziss S. Horizontal mergers and delegation [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001,19: 471-492.
  • 7Gonzalez -Maestre M, J Lopez -Cunat. Delegation and mergers in oligopoly[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2001.19: 1263-1269.
  • 8Williamson an antitrust tradeoffs [J]. Review. 1968. O E. Economics as defense:the welfare American Economic 58: 1372-1376.
  • 9Perry M K. Vertical integration: the monotony case [J]. American Economic Review, 1978,68 (9): 561-569.
  • 10Stigler G J. Monopoly and oligopoly by merger[J]. American Economic Review, 1950, 40 (5): 23-24.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部