期刊文献+

人事筛选和挑选决策策略的比较

Comparing Personnel Selection with Personnel Screening in Decision Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用了多特征决策研究中的过程追踪技术,对人事筛选和挑选决策的策略进行了单步跳转和多步跳转分析与比较。结果发现,在人事挑选时,被试更多采用基于方案的补偿性策略,并以有关合适人选的心理映像为标准做出决策;而筛选时更多采用基于特征的非补偿策略以减少认知负荷,同时,以方案间比较为目的的补偿性策略也更多使用。这些策略变化体现了决策者的认知适应性。 Using process tracing technique, we compared personnel selection with personnel screening in terms of decision strategies on the basis of analysis of single-step transitions and multiple-step transitions in multi-attribute decision tasks.The results showed that, in selection situation, people tended to use compensatory decision strategies and compare a candidate with the image. In screen- ing situation, more attribute-based non-compensatory strategies were used to reduce cognitive load, and more compensatory strategies for candidates comparison were also used. Change of decision strategies demonstrated cognitive adaptability of decision makers.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2004年第2期13-17,共5页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30000053)资助
关键词 人事挑选 人事筛选 决策策略 personnel selection, personnel screening, decision strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Christian S, Stefan T.A new test of image theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1998,75(2): 93 ~ 116
  • 2Ordonnez L D, Benson L, Beach L R. Testing the compatibility test : How instructions, accountability, and anticipated regret affect prechoice screening of options, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999,78(1): 63~80
  • 3Payne J W, Bettman J R, Johnson E L. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993
  • 4何贵兵.多特征决策策略的信息搜索模式分析[J].应用心理学,2000,6(1):45-48. 被引量:3
  • 5严进.多特征多选择决策任务的信息策略测量[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):618-619. 被引量:3
  • 6Ball C.A comparison of single-step and multiple-step transition: Analyses of multi-attribute decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,1997,69(3): 195~204.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Ball C, et al. A comparison of single-step and multiple-step transition t Analyses of multiattribute decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1997,69(3) :195-204.
  • 2Bockenholt U, Hynan L S. Caveats on a process-tracing measure and remedy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1994, 7(7):103-117.
  • 3Payne J W, Bettman J R, Johnson E L. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • 4Schmalhofer F, Albert D, et al. Process trace of binary choices: Evidence for selective and adaptive decision heuristics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1986,38A:59-76.
  • 5Shafir E B, Osherson D N, Smith E E. The advantage model : A comparative theory of evaluation and choice under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1993,5(2) :325-378.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部