期刊文献+

新手抉择专家意见的依据是什么? 被引量:2

What do Novice Depend on for Choice of Expertise?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在科学实践和生活世界中,面对一个问题,当两个专家给出不一致或相冲突的专家意见时,外行或新手是否能够又如何能够获得辩护地相信一个专家意见而不是另一个专家意见? In scientific practice and living world, facing two experts who give inconsistent or contradictive expertise concerning the same problem, whether layman or novice can justifiedly believe/accept not one expertise but another expertise, and how?
作者 丛杭青
机构地区 浙江大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期86-89,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 专家意见 信任 决策依据 科学实践 novice expert expertise trust justification
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Herbert L. Hart. Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory[M]. Oxford University Press, 1983. 261-262.
  • 2C A J Coady. Testimony: A Philosophical Study[ M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1992. 42.
  • 3Hardwig. The Role of Trust in Knowledge[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, Volume: 88, Issue: 12, 1991. 693-708.
  • 4Aristotle. Rhetoric[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1925. 75.
  • 5P Kitcher. The Advancement of Science[ M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1993. 316 - 318.
  • 6A I Goldman. Experts: Which Ones should You Trust?( Epistemie Considerations) [ J ]. Philosophy and Phenolnenological Research, Volume: 63, Issue: 1, 2001. 85-110.
  • 7Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct.2786 (1993).
  • 8Daubert v. MerreU Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F. 3d1311 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995).
  • 9S. Brewer. Scientific Expert Testimony and Intelleetual due Process[J]. The Yale Law Journal, Volume: 107,Issue: 6, 1998. 1538, 1551, 1589, 1535-537.

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部