期刊文献+

加替沙星片随机双盲对照治疗细菌性感染临床研究 被引量:6

A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial of Gatifloxacin vs Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Bacterial Infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价加替沙星片治疗细菌性感染的临床疗效和安全性。方法 :39例病人 ,随机分为治疗组 2 0例和对照组 19例 ,分别应用加替沙星片和左氧氟沙星片 ,剂量均为 0 .2g ,bid ,饭前口服给药 ,疗程 7~ 14d。结果 :加替沙星片和左氧氟沙星片的临床有效率分别为 90 .0 %和 84 .2 % ,细菌清除率分别为 88.2 %和 87.5 % ,两组不良反应发生率分别为 10 %和 15 % ,试验中未见光敏反应及其他严重不良反应。结论 :加替沙星片可作为治疗细菌性感染有效、安全的抗菌药。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin in the treatment of bacterial infections.Method: A clinical randomized double blind controlled trial was conducted, levofloxacin was used as the controlled drug. Dosage:gatifloxacin, 0.2 g,orally,q 12 h;levofloxacin,0.2g, orally,q 12 h.The duration of treatment was 7 14 days.Result: The overall efficacy rate of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin was 90.0% and 84.2% , respectively. The bacterical clearance rate was 88.2% in the gatifloxacin group and 87.5% in the levofloxacin group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups in the above results. The adverse drug reaction rate of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin was 10% and 15%, respectively.Conclusion: Gatifloxacin is a highly effective, safe, and broad spectrum antibacterial agent in the treatment of bacterial infections.
出处 《中国药师》 CAS 2004年第6期416-418,共3页 China Pharmacist
关键词 加替沙星 左氧氟沙星 细菌性感染 临床试验 Gatifloxacin Levofloxacin Bacterial infection Clinical trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Jones RN, Beach ML, Pfaller MA, et al. Antimicrobial activity of gatifloxacin tested against 1676 strains of ciprofloxacin-resistant gram-positive cocci isolated from patient infections in North and South America[J]. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis, 1998,32:247-252
  • 2Perry CM, Barman JA, Lamb HM. Gatifloxacin: ADIS new drug profile[J]. Drugs, 1999,58: 683-696
  • 3Sher LD, McAdoo MA,Bettis RB, et al. A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study of 5-and 10-day gatifloxacin versus 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis[J]. Clin Ther, 2002,24(2):269-281
  • 4Cox CE, Marbury TC, Pittman WG, et al. A randomized, doubleblind, multicenter comparison of gatifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis[J]. Clin Ther, 2002,24(2):223-236
  • 5Tarshis GA, Miskin BM, Jones TM, et al. Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2001,45(8):2358-2562

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部