期刊文献+

躯体化障碍与广泛性焦虑的情绪躯体主诉及服药依从性比较 被引量:3

The comparison of the mood, physical active depiction and drug compliance of the patients with somatic disorders and generalized anxiety disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨躯体化障碍与广泛性焦虑患者的情绪、躯体主诉及服药依从性差异。方法对3 7例躯体化障碍和 3 1例广泛性焦虑分别采用自编躯体症状主诉频数表和汉密尔顿焦虑量表 (HAMA)、抑郁量表 (HAMD)进行测评。结果两组HAMD总分无差异 ,躯体化障碍的认知障碍及阻滞因子分别低于和高于广泛性焦虑 (t =2 .676,P =0 .0 0 9;t =4.13 7,P =0 .0 0 1)。躯体化障碍的HAMA总分及躯体性焦虑分低于广泛性焦虑 (t =3 .773 ,P =0 .0 0 0 ;t =2 .996,P =0 .0 0 4)。胃肠道功能紊乱主诉躯体化障碍患者较常见 ,与自主神经功能紊乱有关的躯体主诉广泛性焦虑更多。服药依从性两组无差异。结论两组疾病症状互有重叠 ,在疾病现象学上缺乏独特性和特征性的症状结构。 Objective To explore the difference between the moods, physical active depiction and drug compliance in patients of somatic disorders and the patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Methods37 patients with somatic disorders and 31 patients with generalized anxiety disorder were studied and compared by the self-edited physical active depiction symptoms scale HAMA and HAMD respectively. Results There was no difference in the grades of HAMD between two groups. The factional grade of cognitive disorder is lower than that of generalized anxiety, but the impair factorial grade is higher than that of somatic disorder (t=2.676,P=0.009;t=4.137,P=0.001).The grade of HAMA in somatic disorder and the grade of somatic anxiety are lower than that of generalized anxiety disorder (t=3.773,P=0.000;t=2.996,P=0.004).Patients with somatic disorder are more obvious in gestational dysfunction as action depiction than other disease .There are many more autonomic dysfunction as active depiction in generalized anxiety. There is no difference in drug compliance between two groups.ConclusionsThe symptoms of two-group disease have the duplicate sections. The phenomenon of disease is lack of trait of symptom structure.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2004年第3期286-287,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 躯体化障碍 广泛性焦虑 服药依从性 情绪障碍 神经症 Somatic disorder Generalized anxiety disorder Emotion disorder Physical active depiction Drug compliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1陶明毅,王希达,施慎逊.抑郁性神经症与抑郁症的诊断范畴问题[J].上海精神医学,1994,6(3):138-141. 被引量:9
  • 2张少平,王纪明.地段医院中神经症的8年随访诊断分析[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1994,27(2):105-107. 被引量:3
  • 3路敦跃.防御方式问卷 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.115-120.
  • 4陈仲庚.实验峤床心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.467.
  • 5中华医学会精神科分会编.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准 第三版[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.108—110.
  • 6路敦跃.防御机制问卷[J].中国心理卫生杂志增刊,1993,:46-53.
  • 7于欣.精神卫生起源归因源量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志增刊,1993,:298-300.
  • 8于欣.精神卫生心理控制源量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志增刊,1993,:300-302.
  • 9Spinhoven P, Kooiman CG. Defense style in depressed and anxious psychiatric outpatients: an explorative study [J ]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1997,185(2) : 87-94.
  • 10Albucher RC, Abelson JL, Nesse RM. Defense mechanism changes in successfully treated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 1998,155(4) : 558-559.

共引文献38

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部