期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜手术与腹横纹小切口手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床对比 被引量:1

Clinical Comparison of Single-Port Laparoscopic and Small Incision Surgery through Lower Abdominal Transverse Striation in the Treatment of Pediatric Indirect Inguinal Hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨单孔腹腔镜与腹横纹小切口手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2019年3月至2022年6月我院收治的544例腹股沟斜疝患儿的临床资料,其中260例行单孔腹腔镜手术(腔镜组),284例行腹横纹小切口手术(开放组)。两组患儿术前基线资料差异无统计学意义,对比分析两组患儿手术时间、术中出血量、术后6小时VAS疼痛评分、术后自主活动时间、住院时间、并发症发生率、复发率等相关指标。结果:腔镜组手术时间、出血量、术后6小时VAS疼痛评分、术后自主活动时间、住院时间、并发症发生率小于开放组(P < 0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝具有手术时间短、并发症少、术后恢复快等优点,值得临床推广。 Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of single-port laparoscopic and small incision surgery through lower abdominal transverse striation for pediatric indirect inguinal hernia. Methods: The clinical data of 544 children with indirect inguinal hernia admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 260 cases of single-port laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopy group) and 284 cases of small incision surgery through lower abdominal transverse striation (open group). Those differences in the baseline data of the two groups before operation failed to reach statistical significance. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, VAS pain scores at postoperative 6 hours, postoperative spontaneous motion time, hospitalization time, incidence of complications, recurrence rate, and other related indicators were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, blood loss, pain scores at postoperative 6 hours, postoperative spontaneous motion time, hospitalization time, and incidence of complications in the laparoscopy group were less than those in the open group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopic high ligation of the inguinal hernia sac for pediatric indirect inguinal hernia has the advantages of short operation time, fewer complications, and fast postoperative recovery, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《临床医学进展》 2023年第11期18020-18024,共5页 Advances in Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献85

  • 1陈金水,蔡晓棠,唐大千,楼朝阳,赵金艺,张罕松,湛继久,尹号.脐正中襞在腹腔镜治疗复发性小儿腹股沟斜疝中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(2):166-167. 被引量:14
  • 2尚培中,周凤桐,刘景章,任爱玲,李德炳,孙印臣.开放法无张力疝修补术治疗隐匿性及早期复发性腹股沟疝[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(7):461-462. 被引量:9
  • 3陈开运,向国安,王汉宁,高鹏,肖方联.腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎联合脐正中襞覆盖内环治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(3):207-209. 被引量:30
  • 4Bittner R, Arregui M E, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treat- ment of inguinal hernia [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2011,25 (9) : 2773 -2843.
  • 5Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, et al. Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta-analysis[ J]. Surg Endosc, 2012,26 ( 12 ) : 3355-3366.
  • 6Antoniou S A, Antoniou G A, Bartseh D K, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitone- al repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of random- ized studies[J]. Am J Surg, 2013,206(2) :245-252.
  • 7Sajid M S, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. A meta-analysis ex- amining the use of racker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2013,206(1) :103-111.
  • 8Lau H, Patil N G. Selective non-stapling of mesh during unilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernio- plasty: a case-control, study [J ]. Arch Surg, 2003,138 (12) :1352-1355.
  • 9Tam K W, Liang H H, Chai C Y, et al. Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. World J Surg, 2010,34 (12) :3065-3074.
  • 10Griffin K J, Harris S, Tang T Y, et al. Incidence of con- tralateral occult inguinal hernia found at the time of lapa- roscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair [J]. Hernia, 2010,14(4) :345-349.

共引文献136

同被引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部