期刊文献+

重症脑出血患者个体化血糖管理的临床意义及预后

Clinical Significance and Prognosis of Individualized Glycemic Management of the Patients with Severe Cerebral Hemorrhage*
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价标准化胰岛素强化治疗对重症脑出血患者预后的影响。方法:451例重症脑出血(GCS评分≤ 8)伴血糖异常升高患者,随机分为胰岛素强化治疗组和常规治疗组,观察治疗30天后病死率。结果:胰岛素强化治疗组和常规治疗组30天的病死率分别是47.79%和41.33%,差异没有统计学意义(P >0.05)。接受胰岛素强化治疗的226例患者中,GHb升高组病死率明显高于GHb正常组(57.14% vs 40.63%,P = 0.01)。接受胰岛素常规治疗的225例患者中,GHb正常组病死率显著高于GHb升高组(49.65% vs 27.38%,P = 0.001)。结论:重症脑出血患者入院时就应该立即测定GHb,进而制定个体化血糖管理目标和胰岛素治疗策略。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of insulin therapy on the prognosis of patients with severe cerebral hemor- rhage. Methods: 451 patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage (GCS score ≤ 8) were randomly divided into two groups, to receive intensive insulin therapy or conventional insulin therapy. The mortality was observed in the 30th day after treatment. Results: No significant difference in the mortality was found between the intensive insulin therapy group and conventional insulin therapy group (P >0.05). In 226 patients receiving intensive insulin treatment, a higher mortality was observed in patients with higher GHb (57.14% vs 40.63%,P = 0.01). In 225 patients receiving conventional insulin treatment, a higher mortality was found in patients with normal GHb (49.65% vs 27.38%,P = 0.001). Conclusion: GHb should be tested in the patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage at admission, to provide information for adopting individualized glycemic management and setting glycemic control targets.
出处 《亚洲急诊医学病例研究》 2013年第2期9-12,共4页 Asian Case Reports in Emergency Medicine
基金 中国医药卫生事业发展基金会ZYYJJ201116资助。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Arias, Second edition. 2003.
  • 2International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Arias, Third edition. 2007.
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.2007中国卫生统计纪要.
  • 4Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2005,353:2643-2653.
  • 5Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes ( UKPDS 35 ) : prospective observational study. BMJ, 2000,321:405- 412.
  • 6Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, et al. Muhifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2003,348:383-393.
  • 7Clement S,Braithwaite SS,Magee MF,et al.Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals.Diabetes Care,2004,27:553-591.
  • 8McCowen KC,Malhotra A,Bistrian BR.Stress-induced hyperglycemia Crit Care Clin,2001,17:107-124.
  • 9Van den Berghe G,Wouters P,Weekers F,et al.Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients.N Engl J Med,2001,345:1359-1367.
  • 10Moghissi ES,Korytkowski MT,DiNardo M,et al.American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control.Diabetes Care,2009,32:1119-1131.

共引文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部