期刊文献+

产志贺毒素大肠杆菌基因分型技术的研究进展

Research Progress in Genotyping of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, STEC)是重要的食源性致病菌,能引起人和动物发生腹泻、出血性肠炎和溶血性尿毒综合症等疾病。为了更好的开展STEC检测、表征、分子进化分析及溯源调查,本文对国内外STEC基因分型技术包括基于酶切扩增分型方法、基于全基因组测序(Whole genome sequencing, WGS)分型方法以及多位点串联重复序列分析(MLVA)、DNA微阵列(DNA microarray)和成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)分型技术研究进展进行综述,并对基因分型研究方法存在的问题进行探讨,为STEC的溯源追踪和流行病学调查提供参考。 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is an important food-borne pathogen, which can cause diseases, such as diarrhea, hemorrhagic enteritis and hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans and animals. In order to implement the detection, characterization, molecular evolution analysis and traceability investigation of STEC more efficiently, the worldwide STEC genotyping techniques including the genotyping methods based on enzyme-cut amplification and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), Multiple Locus Variable number of tandem repeat Analysis (MLVA), DNA microarray and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) were reviewed, and the issues of genotyping methods were discussed, which could provide the valuable information for the STEC traceability and epidemiological investigation.
出处 《微生物前沿》 2020年第3期125-132,共8页 Advances in Microbiology
关键词 产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌 分型技术 全基因组测序 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Genotyping Methods Whole Genome Sequencing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献44

  • 1张强,邢晓楠,王新,王晓,俞英,吴聪明,沈建忠.ST9型动物源耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的分子分型、毒素基因检测及耐药性分析[J].畜牧兽医学报,2014,45(5):853-858. 被引量:8
  • 2汪华,景怀琦,李红卫,倪大新,赵广法,顾玲,杨晋川,史智扬,刘光中,胡晓抒,徐建国.江苏省淮北地区肠出血性大肠埃希菌O157:H7感染性腹泻并发急性肾衰的研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(11):938-940. 被引量:45
  • 3王茂起,刘秀梅,王竹天.中国食品污染监测体系的研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2006,18(6):491-497. 被引量:113
  • 4Vos P, Hogers M, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting [J]. Nucleic Acids Reseach, 1995, 23: 4407-4414.
  • 5Maughan P J, Saghai-Maroof M A, Buss G R, et al. Amplified fragment length polymorphism in soybean: Species diversity, inheritance and near-isogenic line analysis [J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 392-401.
  • 6Barrett B A, Kidwell K K, Fox P N. Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity assessment methods using wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest [J]. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1271-1278.
  • 7Barrett B A, Kidwell K K. AFLP-based genetic diversity among wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest [J]. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1261-1271.
  • 8Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis [J]. Mol Breed, 1996, 2: 225-238.
  • 9Manifesto M M, Schlatter A R, Hopp H E. Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers [J]. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 682-690.
  • 10Huang X, Zeller F J, Hsam S L K. Chromosomal location of AFLP markers in common wheat utilizing nulli-tetrasomic stocks [J]. Genome, 2000, 43: 298-305.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部