期刊文献+

异性拒绝对择偶价值感的影响:择偶计量器的检验

The Influence of Mate-Rejection on Self-Perceived Mate Value: Testing the Mating Sociometer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用回忆范式考察来自异性的拒绝对个体的积极/消极情感、自尊、择偶价值感及择偶标准的影响。实验结果发现:1) 来自异性的拒绝对个体的积极/消极情感产生了影响,自尊在两者之间起了完全的中介作用;2) 异性拒绝通过自尊对择偶价值感产生影响,而择偶价值感在自尊与择偶标准之间起中介作用,由此构建成了一个过程模型。本研究支持和扩展了Kirkpatrick和Ellis(2001)所提出的特定领域社会计量器——择偶计量器的构想:自尊作为一种内在机制,调节着异性拒绝后个体的择偶价值感,并间接影响择偶标准。 The present study which using recall paradigm aimed to investigate the effect of mate-rejection on positive affect and negative affect, self-esteem, self-perceived mate value, mate standard. The result showed: 1)  Mate-rejection makes an impact on positive affect and negative affect, while self-esteem plays fully the mediating role among them;2) Self-esteem fully mediated the impact of mate-rejection on self-perceived mate value, and self-perceived mate value fully mediated the impact of self-esteem on mate standard, thus a process model was built. This research supports and expands a conceptualization of the domain-specific sociometer, which is derived from Kirkpatrick and Ellis (2001): self-esteem as a mechanism functions to calibrate self-perceived mate value in response to experiences of mate-rejection, and makes an indirect effect on mate standard.
作者 阮鲁君 张林
出处 《心理学进展》 2012年第5期243-249,共7页 Advances in Psychology
基金 全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部青年专项课题(EBA090439)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献114

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献7841

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部