期刊文献+

国际情绪图片系统的评估方式研究——以年轻成人为例 被引量:2

The International Affective Picture System (IAPS)——Comparison of Evaluating Method in Young Adults Sample
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际情绪图片系统的发展是为了提供大量标准化,能激发情绪且可以跨国使用的包含广泛语意类别的照片。国际情绪图片系统的研发者使用自我评定模型“一种非语文的图形评估技术”来测量参与者在图片的愉悦度、唤醒度和控制度上的反应。本研究的目的是检验自我评定模型与九点量表间的差异与相关。研究对象:26位受试者平均分为两组,每组针对72张IAPS照片在间隔4周以九点量表与SAM量表分别进行评估,但两组施测顺序采对抗平衡设计。研究结果:对于年轻成人两种评估方式在愉悦度、唤醒度和控制度皆有良好的内部一致性,且两种评估方式的结果没有明显差异。结论与建议:两种方式在年轻成人评估IAPS时都适用,但本研究也存在受试者控制度评估变异较大,未能对年轻成人以外的群体进行两种方式比较的限制,建议欲应用本研究结果时应注意前述限制。 The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) was developed to provide a large set of standardized, emotionally evocative, internationally accessible photographs from a wide range of semantic categories. The researcher used the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique, to measure the pleasure, arousal and dominance associated with the effects of IAPS on the participants. The aim of the present study was to check the difference and any correlation between SAM and a nine-point Likert scale. Twenty-six university students (aged 18-30 years) participated and evaluated 72 pictures twice over four weeks from IAPS using the SAM scale and a nine-point Likert. There were three results. First, the reliability of the internal consistency of the nine-point Likert scale was good. Second, the nine-point Likert scale was significantly correlated with SAM scale. Third, there were no significant differences between the means of the three dimensions of the nine-point Likert scale and the norm of IAPS. In conclusion, the two evaluation methods of IAPS are suitable to be used on young adults. The present data have provided the author with the opportunity to discuss its applications and limitations, as well as relevant recommendations for future research.
出处 《心理学进展》 2014年第2期202-209,共8页 Advances in Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.国际情绪图片系统在中国的试用研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(9):631-634. 被引量:99
  • 2Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affectivepicture system (IAPS) : Instruction manual and affective ratings [ M ] . Technical Report A-6. University of Florida, 2005.
  • 3Grimm S, Schmidt CF, Bermpohl F , et al. Segregated neural representation of distinct emotion dimensions in the prefrontal cortex-an fMRI study [ J ] . Neuroimage, 2006, 30 (1): 325-340.
  • 4Heinzel A, Bermpohl F, Niese R, et al. How do we modulate our emotions? Parametric fMRI reveals cortical midline structures as regions specifically involved in the processing of emotional valences [ J] . Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 2005, 25 (1): 348-358.
  • 5Schnpp HT, Junghofer M, Weike AI, et al. Attention and emotion: an ERP analysis offacilitated emotional stimulus processing [J] . Neuroreport, 2003, 14 (8) : 1107 - 1110.
  • 6Ribeiro RL, Pompria S, Bueno OF. Comparison of Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) [ J ] . Rev Bras Psiquiatr, 2005, 27 (3) : 208 -215.
  • 7Verschuere B, Crombez G, Koster E . The international affective picture system: a cross cultural Flemish validation study [J] . Psychol Belgica, 2001, 41 (4) : 205 -217.
  • 8Vila J, Sanchez M, Ramirez I, et al. The international affective picture system ( IAPS ) : Spanish adaptation: II [J] . Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada, 2001, 54 (4) : 635 -657.
  • 9汤毓华.汉水顿抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:223-226.
  • 10Smith DP, Hillman CH, Duley AR. Influences of age on emotional reactivity during picture processing [ J ] . J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2005, 60 ( 1 ) : 49 - 56.

共引文献5

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部