期刊文献+

员工心理契约违背的形成机制研究:基于工作–家庭关系的视角

The Formation Mechanism of Psychological Contract Violation: Based on Work-Family Interface
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球化时代工作–家庭关系日益成为影响员工相关结果的关键因素。本文以688名中国员工为研究对象,运用SPSS 22.0与Mplus 6.12统计软件,从工作–家庭关系的视角探索我国员工心理契约违背的形成机制。结果发现,工作–家庭支持氛围对心理契约违背具直接负向影响,亦可通过工作–家庭增益的中介作用对心理契约违背产生间接负向影响;此外,工作–家庭侵入对工作–家庭支持氛围与工作–家庭增益之间关系具调节作用,具体地,员工经历的工作–家庭侵入越高,工作–家庭支持氛围对工作–家庭增益的正向影响越小。结果表明,在中国情境下,工作–家庭关系对员工心理契约违背的形成具有重要影响,这为组织构建良好工作–家庭关系的管理实践提供了理论依据。 This study explores formation mechanism of psychological contract violation from the perspective of work family interface. The aim of this paper is to address with the flow question: in the context of Chinese organizations, whether work-family support climate has significant influence on psychological contract violation, and what are the major mediating and moderation mechanisms linking work-family support climate and psychological contract violation. Data was collected from 668 full-time Chinese employees by online panel Sojump.com. The results show that work-family support climate has significantly negative effect on psychological contract violation;work-family enrichment mediates the relationship between work-family support climate and psychological contract violation, demonstrating work-family interface is a unique angle for explaining how family-support in work place relieves negative employee outcomes. Work-family interference moderates the relationship between work-family support climate and work-family enrichment. For employees experiencing higher work-family interference, work-family support climate has less positive influence on work-family enrichment. The implications of these findings are explored and discussed.
出处 《心理学进展》 2017年第5期766-775,共10页 Advances in Psychology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务基金资助项目(2016SK03) 北京电子科技学院2016年博士启动基金资助项目。
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献61

  • 1林初锐,李永鑫,胡瑜.社会支持的调节作用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1116-1119. 被引量:82
  • 2李金波,许百华,陈建明.影响员工工作投入的组织相关因素研究[J].应用心理学,2006,12(2):176-181. 被引量:125
  • 3Adams, G. A., Daniel, L. A. K., & Daniel, W. K. (1996). Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 411-420.
  • 4Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435.
  • 5Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
  • 6Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • 7Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
  • 8Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
  • 9Baker, E., Israel, B., & Schurman, S. (1996). Role of control and support in occupational stress: An integrated model. Social Science & Medicine, 43(7), 1145-1159.
  • 10Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328.

共引文献115

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部