期刊文献+

同伴在场使青少年更爱冒险:来自脑科学研究的证据

Peer Presence Makes Adolescents More Risk Taking: Evidence from Brain Science Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 青春期是冲动冒险的高发期,从事冒险行为不仅会给青少年的健康发展造成极大威胁,也可能会威胁社会的稳定发展。已有研究证实,相比于独自一人,同伴在场会加剧青少年的冒险决策。基于双系统模型和三角模型的观点,神经科学的研究也发现,同伴在场可能会通过增强奖励敏感性,降低认知控制水平来影响青少年冒险行为。未来研究可从神经动态网络层面继续完善同伴在场影响冒险行为的脑机制研究,进一步规范同伴在场的操纵,并重视青少年冒险行为的本土化研究。 Adolescence is a high incidence period of impulsive risk-taking. Engaging in risk-taking behavior will pose a great threat not only to the healthy development of teenagers, but also to the stable development of society. Studies have shown that peer presence exacerbates teenagers’ risky decisions than being alone. According to two-system model and triangular model, neuroscience studies have also found that peer presence may influence adolescent risk-taking behavior by enhancing reward sensitivity and reducing the level of cognitive control. Future research can continue to improve the brain mechanism of peer presence influencing risk-taking behavior from the perspective of neural dynamic network, further standardize peer presence manipulation, and pay attention to the localization study of adolescent risk-taking behavior.
作者 程丹俐 窦凯
出处 《心理学进展》 2020年第7期897-904,共8页 Advances in Psychology
关键词 同伴在场 青少年 冒险行为 神经机制 Peer Presence Adolescents Risk Taking Neural Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献92

  • 1田录梅.Rosenberg(1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足[J].心理学探新,2006,26(2):88-91. 被引量:318
  • 2京涛.(2012).个体人格特质对跨期决策的影响及其神经基础.西南大学博士学位论文.
  • 3Baumeister, R. F. , Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego-de-pletion: A resource model of volition: Self- regulation and con- trolled processing. Social Cognition, 18(2 ) , 130 - 150.
  • 4Baumeister, R. F. , & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: The Penguin Press.
  • 5Banmeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self - control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351 -356.
  • 6Ben - Zur, H. , & Zeidner, M. (2009). Threat to life and risk - taking behaviors: A review of empirical findings and explanatory models. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2 ) , 109 -128.
  • 7Bruyneel, S. D. , Dewitte, S. , Franses, P. H. , & Dekimpe, M. G. (2009). I felt low and my purse feels light: Depleting mood regula- tion attempts affect risk decision making. Journal of Behavioral Deci- siorr Making, 22, 153 - 170.
  • 8DeWall, C. N. , Baumeister, R. F. , Gailliot, M. T. , & Maner, J. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self - regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personal- ity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (12), 1653 - 1662.
  • 9Ferreira, M. B. , Garcia- Marques, L. , Sherman, S. J. , & Sherman, J. W. (2005). Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 797 -813.
  • 10Fischer, P. , Greitemeyer, T. , Kastenmttller, A. , Vogrincic, C. , & Saver, A. (2011). The effects of risk- glorifying media exposure on risk - positive cognitions, emotions, and behaviors : A meta - an- alytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3) , 367 - 390.

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部