期刊文献+

面孔识别中脑电成分P1,N170和N250的民族特征反应

The Ethnic Characteristic Reaction of EEG Components P1, N170 and N250 in Face Recognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为了调查面孔识别中的脑电成分P1,N170,N250是否能够准确的反映出面孔的民族特征,本研究设计了专门检测面孔民族特征信息的实验范式进行探究。方法:选取31名大学生作为被试,采用“平均面孔”以凸显民族信息,改变“平均面孔”的变形程度操纵被试对该特征信息的判断,同时记录被试的脑电与行为数据。结果:对被试反应时间数据的方差分析显示出变形水平的主效应十分显著F(6,174) = 25,P ηp2=0.46。被试民族与目标面孔民族交互作用显著F(1,29) = 8.7,P = 0.006, 。脑电结果显示同族与异族面孔所引起的P1,N170波幅差异并不显著t(30) = 1.70,p = 0.09;t(30) = 1.87,P = 0.07,而N250波幅差异十分显著t(30) = 2.84,P = 0.01。结论:面孔识别中早期的脑电成分P1,N170成分对面孔的民族特征并不敏感,N250成分对不同民族面孔的特征信息具有良好的检出性。 Objective: To investigate whether the eeg components P1, N170 and N250 in face recognition can accurately reflect the ethnic characteristics of faces. In this study, an experimental paradigm spe-cifically designed to detect the ethnic characteristics of faces was designed to explore. Methods: Thirty-one college students were selected as subjects, and “average face” was used to highlight na-tional information, and the deformation degree of “average face” was changed to manipulate the judgment of the characteristic information. Meanwhile, eeg and behavioral data of the subjects were recorded. Results: The variance analysis of the reaction time data showed that the main effect of deformation level was very significant: F(6,174) = 25, P ηp2=0.46 . The participants’ ethnicity had significant interaction with the target face ethnicity (F(1,29) = 8.7, p = 0.006, and  ). The eeg results showed that the amplitude of P1, N170 caused by homologous and alien faces was not significantly different t(30) = 1.70, P = 0.09. t(30) = 1.87, P = 0.07, and N250 amplitude difference is very significant t(30) = 2.84, P = 0.01, d = 0.47. Conclusion: In the early stage of face recognition, components P1 and N170 are not sensitive to the ethnic characteristics of faces, while N250 has a good ability to detect the characteristic information of faces of different ethnic groups.
作者 岳亚奇
机构地区 石河子大学
出处 《心理学进展》 2020年第12期1931-1938,共8页 Advances in Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1Sedikides C, Ostrom T M. Perceptions of group variability: Moving from an uncertain crawl to a purposeful stride. Social Cognition, 1993, 11: 165~174
  • 2Linville P W, Fischer G W, Salovey P. Perceived distributions of the characteristics of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57: 165~188
  • 3Levin D T. Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22: 1364~1382
  • 4Malpass R S, Kravitz J. Recognition for face of own and other race. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 1969, 13: 330~334
  • 5Shepard J. Social factors in face recognition. In: Davies G., Ellis H, Shepard J. ed. Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic Press, 1981
  • 6Carey S, Diamond R. From piecemeal to configural representation of face. Science, 1977, 195: 312~313
  • 7Flin R. Development of face recognition: An encoding switch? British Journal of Psychology, 1985, 76: 123~134
  • 8Donchin E, Fabiani M. The use of event-related brain potentials in the study of memory:Is P300 a measure of event distinctiveness? In : Jennings J R, Coles M G H, ed. Handbook of Cognitive Psychophysiology: Central and Autonomic System Approches. Chichester: Wiley, 1991. 471~498
  • 9Paller K A, Kutas M, Mayes A R. Brain Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography an Clinical Neurophysiology, 1987, 67: 361~71
  • 10David F, Charlotte T. An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychologia, 1999, (1): 1~16

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部