期刊文献+

社会创业企业资源拼凑前因分析——基于fsQCA

Analysis of the Antecedent Combinations of Bricolage in Social Entrepreneurship—Based on fsQCA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了给处于资源困境中的社会创业企业选择有效的资源拼凑策略,在资源拼凑理论的基础上,以24家社会企业为研究对象,运用FsQCA方法研究了导致社会企业需求型及构想型拼凑行为的前因组合。结果表明:① 高先前经验、低创业导向、低环境包容性的社会企业采取需求性拼凑行为的几率更大;② 高先前经验、高战略柔性以及低环境包容性的社会企业发生需求型拼凑行为的几率也比较大;③ 高创业导向、高环境包容性的社会企业发生构想型拼凑行为的几率比较大。研究扩充了社会创业资源拼凑相关领域的理论知识,为社会创业企业克服资源限制并提高其合法性和公司绩效提供了指南。 In order to provide social entrepreneurship in resource dilemma with effective bricolage strategy, based on bricolage theory, this paper studied the antecedent combinations that influence demand-based and ideational bricolage in social entrepreneurship by using the method of fsQCA in 24 samples. The results show that: 1) Social entrepreneurship with high prior experience, low entrepreneurial orientation and low environmental munificence tend to adopt demand-based bricolage;2) Social entrepreneurship with high prior experience, high strategic flexibility and low environmental munificence tend to adopt demand-based bricolage;3) Social entrepreneurship with high entrepreneurial orientation and high environmental munificence are more inclined to adopt ideational bricolage. This study enriches the research in the fields related to bricolage of social entrepreneurship, and plays a certain guiding role in breaking through the resource dilemma of social entrepreneurship, improving the legitimacy and enterprise performance.
出处 《心理学进展》 2021年第12期2694-2706,共13页 Advances in Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献254

  • 1夏鑫,何建民,刘嘉毅.定性比较分析的研究逻辑——兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J].财经研究,2014,40(10):97-107. 被引量:86
  • 2胡相峰,陈延斌.略论传统节俭思想的现代伦理价值[J].江苏社会科学,2005(6):228-231. 被引量:2
  • 3贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(3):94-103. 被引量:194
  • 4[英]安德鲁·坝贝尔 等.核心能力战略——以核心竞争力为基础的战略[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1999.64-78.
  • 5[美]彼得·德鲁克.非营利组织的管理[M].吴振阳,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2007:187.
  • 6WINTER S,SZULANSKI G. Replication as Strategy [J]. Organization Science, 2001,12(2) :730-743.
  • 7ADLER P S,BORYS B. Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,41(11): 61-89.
  • 8GUPTA A K, SMITH K G. The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(5) :693-706.
  • 9MARCH J G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(6):71-87.
  • 10HITT M A,KEATS B W. Navigating in the New competitive Landscape: Building Strategic Flexibility and Competitive Advantage in the 21st Century[J]. The Academy of Management Executive, 1998, 12 (4) :22 -42.

共引文献2267

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部